• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Squadron 42 Will Release in 2026 for PC with 30-40 Hours of Campaign, Prologue Gameplay Revealed

TxKnight7

Member


Squadron 42 has the most top acting talent of any videogame ever
Henry Cavill، Andy Serkis، Mark Hamill ،Gary Oldman ، Gillian Anderson ،John Rhys-Davies Ben Mendelsohn etc

95vCe7m.jpeg

eKPxReI.jpeg

cUGq7CH.jpeg
2tAzkcf.png


maybe they don't want to release it 2025 next to GTA 6 ?

bvNYl3Q.jpeg


t5se1r%2Fpreview%2F61727716%2Fmain_large.gif
 
Last edited:

Comandr

Member
2026. 😂

Just another kick the can down the road timetable to get people off their backs for awhile.

I knew in 2014 this whole thing was basically a giant fraud just to continually make money but never deliver a game. It just reeks of fraud.
How can anyone actually say things like this? They just showed an hour of actual on stage gameplay and the game looks excellent. 2 more years to polish it up and it’s going to be something really special.

Like… how far up your own ass does your head need to be to just ignore everything they showed at the convention today?
 
How can anyone actually say things like this? They just showed an hour of actual on stage gameplay and the game looks excellent. 2 more years to polish it up and it’s going to be something really special.

Like… how far up your own ass does your head need to be to just ignore everything they showed at the convention today?
Because they’ve been working on it for….how long? Come on, use your common sense. It’s never coming out. Mainstream press have been running articles suggesting fraud for literally a decade. This is not even my original idea, I’m just agreeing with it.

It was announced in fucking *2012*. Don’t get on my ass about how I’m somehow being the ridiculous one. Let’s look at the facts.
 
Last edited:

diffusionx

Gold Member
How can anyone actually say things like this? They just showed an hour of actual on stage gameplay and the game looks excellent. 2 more years to polish it up and it’s going to be something really special.

Like… how far up your own ass does your head need to be to just ignore everything they showed at the convention today?
I'll believe it when I see it. They've said things before.
 
Because their primary concern is driving crowdfunding revenue, not shipping a good game.
This. 💯 %. I remember an article about this game suggesting the same thing from nearly a decade ago, and looking into it myself. It clearly seems like a long-running fraud to me. I would expect criminal charges at some point, but the charges always come after the shit really hits the fan. The longer they can prop everything up, the longer they can get away with it and keep making money off it.
 

Comandr

Member
Because they’ve been working on it for….how long? Come on, use your common sense. It’s never coming out. Mainstream press have been running articles suggesting fraud for literally a decade. This is not even my original idea, I’m just agreeing with it.
Game development takes time. I don't understand how anyone can question this. FFXV was in development for 10 years and that game has a significantly smaller scope than the TWO GAMES that CIG is developing side by side. Like.. what's your point? Prey took 11 years. Duke Nukem, famously, 14 years. Shit happens. Games take time to make. That doesn't just automatically make them scams.

Flotsam, for instance, entered early access just over 5 years ago, and was a massively smaller game in scope back then. Today, its at version 0.8.5, and basically a completely different game. It's still not a scam.
 

Ribi

Member
A show of hands now. How many of you all actually watched th demo before posting sunk cost fallacy or scam?
 
Game development takes time. I don't understand how anyone can question this. FFXV was in development for 10 years and that game has a significantly smaller scope than the TWO GAMES that CIG is developing side by side. Like.. what's your point? Prey took 11 years. Duke Nukem, famously, 14 years. Shit happens. Games take time to make. That doesn't just automatically make them scams.

Flotsam, for instance, entered early access just over 5 years ago, and was a massively smaller game in scope back then. Today, its at version 0.8.5, and basically a completely different game. It's still not a scam.
The difference is, FF XV *actually came out*. Not to mention it was confirmed to have not always been in active development that entire time. It also began as PS3-era game.

This isn’t rocket science. Read up on Star Citizen if you’re truly not skeptical.

 
Last edited:

OmegaSupreme

advanced basic bitch
Game development takes time. I don't understand how anyone can question this. FFXV was in development for 10 years and that game has a significantly smaller scope than the TWO GAMES that CIG is developing side by side. Like.. what's your point? Prey took 11 years. Duke Nukem, famously, 14 years. Shit happens. Games take time to make. That doesn't just automatically make them scams.

Flotsam, for instance, entered early access just over 5 years ago, and was a massively smaller game in scope back then. Today, its at version 0.8.5, and basically a completely different game. It's still not a scam.
Was final fantasy 15 crowd funded?
 

clarky

Gold Member
I thought what they showed looked great.

If it never turns up then whatever, loads of other stuff to play but i like the shit that they show at these things.
 
Last edited:

diffusionx

Gold Member
Game development takes time. I don't understand how anyone can question this. FFXV was in development for 10 years and that game has a significantly smaller scope than the TWO GAMES that CIG is developing side by side. Like.. what's your point? Prey took 11 years. Duke Nukem, famously, 14 years. Shit happens. Games take time to make. That doesn't just automatically make them scams.

Flotsam, for instance, entered early access just over 5 years ago, and was a massively smaller game in scope back then. Today, its at version 0.8.5, and basically a completely different game. It's still not a scam.
The idea that a 30 hour Wing Commander spirital sequel would need 14 years of development is just totally ridiculous. As ridiculous as the idea a FPS as shitty as DNF needed 14 years. I said it in the other thread but the entire Wing Commander series, start to finish, was released between 1990 and 1997.

Most of the time spent was not on this game and everyone knows this. You listed three projects that were total disasters and claimed that's the norm. Get serious. I don't know that Flotsam is but sounds shitty.
 
Last edited:

Comandr

Member
Because their primary concern is driving crowdfunding revenue, not shipping a good game.
I'm disappointed in this comment. You of all people should know that, as a spiritual successor to Wing Commander, of course Squadron 42 is going to have a lot of big actors. Wing Commander 3 famously had quite a lot of big actors, including Mark Hamill, Tim Curry, and John Rhys-Davies. There is no way Chris Roberts wouldn't bring big names for his big spiritual successor.
 

Sgt.Asher

Member
Two years away since 2016, remember it was feature complete then.
Cryengine(which star engine is) is also a video rendering software. CiG is not above putting in fake gameplay videos and have do it every citcon
 
Last edited:
I'm disappointed in this comment. You of all people should know that, as a spiritual successor to Wing Commander, of course Squadron 42 is going to have a lot of big actors. Wing Commander 3 famously had quite a lot of big actors, including Mark Hamill, Tim Curry, and John Rhys-Davies. There is no way Chris Roberts wouldn't bring big names for his big spiritual successor.

This was published in *2016*. C’mon. Acknowledge how completely ridiculous that is. At this point it’s far beyond reasonable.
 
Is it just me or is that gameplay video tearing like crazy?

why would you demo a game without vsync enabled? wtf?
Because it’s been in “development” for 14 years and it’s likely nowhere near as close to release as they are trying to make it appear. Given that originally they were planning to release in 2015.
 

Comandr

Member
The idea that a 30 hour Wing Commander spirital sequel would need 14 years of development is just totally ridiculous. As ridiculous as the idea a FPS as shitty as DNF needed 14 years. I said it in the other thread but the entire Wing Commander series, start to finish, was released between 1990 and 1997.

Most of the time spent was not on this game and everyone knows this. You listed three projects that were total disasters and claimed that's the norm. Get serious. I don't know that Flotsam is but sounds shitty.
Okay. Well GTA6 has been in development since 2014. That's going to be 11 years. Is that game a disaster? Starfield started predevelopment in 2012. That's 11 years. Dev cycles are just longer now, because games are bigger than they used to be.
 
Okay. Well GTA6 has been in development since 2014. That's going to be 11 years. Is that game a disaster? Starfield started predevelopment in 2012. That's 11 years. Dev cycles are just longer now, because games are bigger than they used to be.
A) GTA6 isn’t being crowdfunded
B) GTA6 was never promised to come out and then took another 14 years, only to find out that yet another far-off release date for two years from now is now the next promised date. With no reason/ precedent whatsoever to assume they would be able to meet that date.

You are conflating things that are not even remotely similar. That’s why your thesis is so bad, because it’s inherently based on a false premise.
 
Last edited:

diffusionx

Gold Member
Okay. Well GTA6 has been in development since 2014. That's going to be 11 years. Is that game a disaster? Starfield started predevelopment in 2012. That's 11 years. Dev cycles are just longer now, because games are bigger than they used to be.
GTA6 isn’t crowdfunded, it’s coming off literally the biggest game of anll time, and besides, the devs there have earned the trust of players in a way this group hasn’t.

It’s crazy how defensive star citizen people are over this products. It always devolves into this. Yea bro people have a reason to doubt this project, they’ve been squeezing whales for over a decade and the game they pitched in 2012 isn’t even close to out yet. We are long past the point where the only thing that will shut people up is if the game comes out and is actually awesome.
 
Last edited:
That was stupidly boring, I set it to 2x speed and was still bored out of my mind, nothing happens for 25+ minutes.
Then 45 minutes in the damn thing crashes mid cutscene, they restart and then 15 minutes later there's some on foot gameplay again.
0 flight gameplay in the whole thing.
Then there's all the jank and screen tearing, just an awful demo/presentation.
Also this lmao wtf
9RTtAlN.gif
 

rodrigolfp

Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
A) doesn’t matter, not applicable in this context
B) so you acknowledge it did indeed come out
C) Sold 10+ million copies and is by no means considered a bad game
A) Matters if this don't suck.
B) Doesn't matter if this comes out.
C) I, as a consumer, don't care.
 
Okay. Well GTA6 has been in development since 2014. That's going to be 11 years. Is that game a disaster? Starfield started predevelopment in 2012. That's 11 years. Dev cycles are just longer now, because games are bigger than they used to be.
None of those games were in full production during those years since they were busy with other games they've already released.

Keep trying champ
 
Last edited:

Comandr

Member

This was published in *2016*. C’mon. Acknowledge how completely ridiculous that is. At this point it’s far beyond reasonable.
And you have to understand that the game is massively different in scope than they originally pitched. Jesus, look at the original squadron 42 teaser. It's laughable compared to what we got today. It's not like they have just been sitting on their thumbs and letting the money pile in. At the end of the day, it's just a fuckin video game. I pledged 40 bucks ten years ago for the package that contained SC and SQ42. I would rather have today's game, than whatever they were showing in 2012 as their pitch.
 
Top Bottom