XXL
Member
Np.
I'm going to come into every thread that has nothing to do with me or things I'm interested in from now on.
Np.
Speaking of Narrative Projection™. DenchDeckard (and DarkMage619 who no surprise liked his post) arguing about "failure on the marketing of this machine" in multiple threads because he thinks "performance framerates at something like fidelity quality" can only be inferred as "60-120hz at high settings" by people.Narrative Projection™ from the Xbox slampigbassador lot.
Clowns.
What's wild is MS ended up removing the inside series s video where Ronald McDonald claimed "just lower resolution" for the series s.Speaking of Narrative Projection™. DenchDeckard (and DarkMage619 who no surprise liked his post) arguing about "failure on the marketing of this machine" in multiple threads because he thinks "performance framerates at something like fidelity quality" can only be inferred as "60-120hz at high settings" by people.
It's almost like Dench studied comments about the Series S and is repeating it in the hope it has a similar effect.
I distinctly remember some xbox user being disappointed about the Series S performance in some thread for a game that ran at 30fps, low settings along with the lower res and another thread about devs complaining about Series S being a pain. This user was complaining how the marketing from Jason Roland "just at a lower resolution" was essentially bullshit and Series S had to have drastic cutbacks beyond res.
Both Darkmage and Dench were attacking the guy in both threads :
Yet here he is trying to get a similar narrative going now for the best console by concentrating on a "marketing is misleading" narrative. Follow your own advice DenchDeckard and stop continuously complaining about something that wasn't said, in multiple threads. That narrative isn't going to happen. nobody expected highest settings at anything close to 120fps. Only something like fidelity quality on base PS5 now running at performance mode (60fps) on Pro and that's what's happening mostly. There are exceptions where it's better (like Capcom games) and vice versa.
The threads for anybody who wasn't in them at the time. 1, 2.
Still think the Series S is a beast Dench or is that too embarrassing to admit now that the truth about the machine finally surfaced and those anonymous devs were right?
I said this many times here but this is the same Jason Ronald that was with a group of us in Discord watching the Road to PS5 and he laughed at how much effort was put into the PS5 SSD and he was convinced the Series X was winning every head to head matchup in games simply because of more TFsWhat's wild is MS ended up removing the inside series s video where Ronald McDonald claimed "just lower resolution" for the series s.
Speaking of Narrative Projection™. DenchDeckard (and DarkMage619 who no surprise liked his post) arguing about "failure on the marketing of this machine" in multiple threads because he thinks "performance framerates at something like fidelity quality" can only be inferred as "60-120hz at high settings" by people.
It's almost like Dench studied comments about the Series S and is repeating it in the hope it has a similar effect.
I distinctly remember some xbox user being disappointed about the Series S performance in some thread for a game that ran at 30fps, low settings along with the lower res and another thread about devs complaining about Series S being a pain. This user was complaining how the marketing from Jason Roland "just at a lower resolution" was essentially bullshit and Series S had to have drastic cutbacks beyond res.
Both Darkmage and Dench were attacking the guy in both threads :
Yet here he is trying to get a similar narrative going now for the best console by concentrating on a "marketing is misleading" narrative. Follow your own advice DenchDeckard and stop continuously complaining about something that wasn't said, in multiple threads. That narrative isn't going to happen. nobody expected highest settings at anything close to 120fps. Only something like fidelity quality on base PS5 now running at performance mode (60fps) on Pro and that's what's happening mostly. There are exceptions where it's better (like Capcom games) and vice versa.
The threads for anybody who wasn't in them at the time. 1, 2.
Still think the Series S is a beast Dench or is that too embarrassing to admit now that the truth about the machine finally surfaced and those anonymous devs were right?
Seems the tl;dr that most are saying is that it's worth it if you game a lot. But if you're more casual and you're happy with the base PS5, it's a skip.
Sounds fine to me - the PS5 Pro is aimed at the hardcore gamer, not someone who turns it on to play games a couple of times a week.
Definitely worth waiting on the Pro if folks are looking for new games to take advantage of the hardware. I'm among those who see a lot I haven't played in the current list of Pro enhanced games. Mileage on the Pro as it stands now it going to vary from person to person.
Sure you take a ps5 digital 1tb add 1tb nvme for 2tb total and it's around $530. $550-600 for the PS5 Pro yeah i could see that... 67% bigger gpu, PSSR hardware, 2gb DDR5, improved RT and wifi 7 for $20-70 more.Worth $700? Of course not. The right price would be $550~600 WITH the disc drive. But that's what happens when you have no competition.
Fatality.Speaking of Narrative Projection™. DenchDeckard (and DarkMage619 who no surprise liked his post) arguing about "failure on the marketing of this machine" in multiple threads because he thinks "performance framerates at something like fidelity quality" can only be inferred as "60-120hz at high settings" by people.
It's almost like Dench studied comments about the Series S and is repeating it in the hope it has a similar effect.
I distinctly remember some xbox user being disappointed about the Series S performance in some thread for a game that ran at 30fps, low settings along with the lower res and another thread about devs complaining about Series S being a pain. This user was complaining how the marketing from Jason Roland "just at a lower resolution" was essentially bullshit and Series S had to have drastic cutbacks beyond res.
Both Darkmage and Dench were attacking the guy in both threads :
Yet here he is trying to get a similar narrative going now for the best console by concentrating on a "marketing is misleading" narrative. Follow your own advice DenchDeckard and stop continuously complaining about something that wasn't said, in multiple threads. That narrative isn't going to happen. nobody expected highest settings at anything close to 120fps. Only something like fidelity quality on base PS5 now running at performance mode (60fps) on Pro and that's what's happening mostly. There are exceptions where it's better (like Capcom games) and vice versa.
The threads for anybody who wasn't in them at the time. 1, 2.
Still think the Series S is a beast Dench or is that too embarrassing to admit now that the truth about the machine finally surfaced and those anonymous devs were right?
Pssr in jedi survivor is shit. Like so bad i want my base ps5 back
ok...someone being slow and not getting hardware doesn't mean you should jump in with emOk, His opinion clearly is shared by many people across the internet
Dang it I just remembered I will get my choice of avatar for DenchDeckard on the 23'rd. What ever will I come up with that is the question.
Pssr in jedi survivor is shit. Like so bad i want my base ps5 back
How so?
Can you elaborate a bit please.
Sony putting Concord on PS+ within 3 months.What was the bet?
Probably this....
Looks like they jacked up performance mode.
Sony putting Concord on PS+ within 3 months.
Ah, that looks like sub pixel shimmering. Is Jedi one of the Pro enhanced game that's confirmed to use PSSR? Could be an artifact of the early days.
He said that would happen?
The Pro actually does exactly what you describe here. No more needing to worry about fidelity or performance mode with the Pro. FF7 Rebirth is all the proof you need but there are plenty more games as well.Cuz the pro is underpowered. We can't even have fidelity and performance in a single mode in most games. The Price is the main issue here, I'm okay spending 800€ but that thing has to be a beast, which it isn't.
this is a good example of pssr fuck up.How so?
Can you elaborate a bit please.
Silent hill 2 and outlwas as well.Ah, that looks like sub pixel shimmering. Is Jedi one of the Pro enhanced game that's confirmed to use PSSR? Could be an artifact of the early days.
this is a good example of pssr fuck up.
I know we do t like this content here but you can see a huge difference between base ps5 and pro.
Jedi survivor has the same issue. Its like the whole screen is just shimmering all over the place.
It usses pssr for upscaling. No other upgrades for now. Store also shows pro enhancedDid the Silent Hill 2 ps5 pro update came out? I don't see it came out. Why are you posting a video of a game that dosen't have the ps5 pro update yet?
No it dosen't. There is no support PSSR or PS5 pro.It usses pssr for upscaling. No other upgrades for now. Store also shows pro enhanced
Problem is its already using pssr and the image shimmer is horrible.
Game was fine on base ps5 but i stopped playing to wait for the pro version.
There is no option to play it in base ps5 mode
Buddy i am looking at my screen here. I am not talking out of my ass like youNo it dosen't. There is no support PSSR or PS5 pro.
Sure you know more than the Silent Hill 2 dev and say it has PSSR that it dosen't say it's supported not even in one patch note.Buddy i am looking at my screen here. I am not talking out of my ass like you
If only it was only €849 in Sweden I might have even considered it..Kind of shows here in Sweden, every single store has them in stock.
i wish i would know how to upload a gif of what i recorded.Sure you know more than the Silent Hill 2 dev and say it has PSSR that it dosen't say it's supported in not even one patch note. Your screen says upscaled with PSSR.
Sure you know more than the Silent Hill 2 dev and say it has PSSR that it dosen't say it's supported not even in one patch note.
Did i say you were wrong or that you are lying? That what you say is not true? About the shimmering ? I only told you the PS5 Pro support is not out yet only that. Why are you so salty about it?
I mean, no, of course it isn't. But my RTX3090 wasn't worth the AUD$[redacted] I paid when I bought it. But I didn't buy it because it was worth the money - I bought it because I had the money and I wanted it. That's the enthusiast hardware market - seems odd people looking to justify it after we already did this song and dance for the PS4 Pro.
lmao kinda spot on, and soon enough we have 50-series from Nvidia, ARM entering the desktop space, next Xbox, Xbox handheld, Switch 2, Steam Deck 2, PS6 etc
And so those who don't have a PS5 and those who have a PS5 clashed in battle, they were joined by those who bought a PS5 PRO and those who refuse to buy a PS5 PRO because they already have a PS5, seeing a bloody battle PC fans decided to join the fight, because without them, no one will figure it out. And there was no end to this battle...
God, I love Neogaf
It also means no bad ports to series x anymore.Yup that's what I gathered from this video.
It's a future proof Console with future games taking full advantage of the hardware. So in essence what we have now with current games is a glimpse of that future.
Still happy with my purchase either way.
Yeah, $650 for me. $1130 for the Pro with disc drive. As of today, worth it. No coil whine is like putting on noise cancelling headphones, so nice.Cheap ass Americans
Base PS5 was 700 here
I can’t remember a console ever causing this much salt, aggression, and hate.
If 700 dollars is in your budget and you actually play PS5 games, it's a no brainer.
If you can't afford it, you can't afford it.
The best way to look at it is this. How much are you willing to pay for a GPU upgrade to your PS5?
If you are in the camp of "it's not a significant upgrade" then I'm sorry, you are trying to convince yourself, not us. It is, and nearly every relevant new game that comes out will be better on the Pro.
If you are of the "it may not receive support" camp then you don't understand how any of this works and you should kinda research a bit I think. Again this is wishful thinking.
The only argument against the Pro that really has any basis in truth is that you cannot afford it. I understand and that does suck. However, if Sony offered a GPU upgrade via software that did the same thing on vanilla PS5 for free, are you telling me you would not want the upgrade? Of course you would. Everyone who owns a ps5, and I mean everyone, wants a free gpu upgrade. They just don't want to pay for it.
Here you go:
She: What kind of woman do you think I am?
He: We’ve already established that. Now we’re just haggling over the price.
PS: Also "Sony charged too much" is an argument against Sony and not the Pro. You are mad at Sony. That said, the XSX with similar SSD size and no upgrades is not much cheaper, so I think if you honestly compare the hardware costs vs what you get, it isn't that much overpriced, but that is just my opinion and well unrelated to the Pro's performance while gaming, which is elite. Every day that goes by, every game that comes out, we will be getting more for our investment here. Each new game that is pro enhanced increases the value of the pro itself.
Speaking of Narrative Projection™. DenchDeckard (and DarkMage619 who no surprise liked his post) arguing about "failure on the marketing of this machine" in multiple threads because he thinks "performance framerates at something like fidelity quality" can only be inferred as "60-120hz at high settings" by people.
It's almost like Dench studied comments about the Series S and is repeating it in the hope it has a similar effect.
I distinctly remember some xbox user being disappointed about the Series S performance in some thread for a game that ran at 30fps, low settings along with the lower res and another thread about devs complaining about Series S being a pain. This user was complaining how the marketing from Jason Roland "just at a lower resolution" was essentially bullshit and Series S had to have drastic cutbacks beyond res.
Both Darkmage and Dench were attacking the guy in both threads :
Yet here he is trying to get a similar narrative going now for the best console by concentrating on a "marketing is misleading" narrative. Follow your own advice DenchDeckard and stop continuously complaining about something that wasn't said, in multiple threads. That narrative isn't going to happen. nobody expected highest settings at anything close to 120fps. Only something like fidelity quality on base PS5 now running at performance mode (60fps) on Pro and that's what's happening mostly. There are exceptions where it's better (like Capcom games) and vice versa.
The threads for anybody who wasn't in them at the time. 1, 2.
Still think the Series S is a beast Dench or is that too embarrassing to admit now that the truth about the machine finally surfaced and those anonymous devs were right?