But the flop difference between the base PS5 vs the Pro is 60% in favor of the Pro 16 vs 10. And the texturing fill-rate is slightly over 60% still in favor of the Pro.
Well it's not 33.4 Tflops that's for certain. Can't argue against what sony puts in the manual.
For pure rasterization, yes.
Pure rasterization has more to do with the number of Shader Engines and clock speeds than floating operations per second (The reason behind PS5 being faster than XSX in pure rasterisation). If the two shader engines from the leak for PS5 PRO is correct then there is no uplift at all at at least in the context of rasterizer/prim units. The remaining (big) part of the question is the nature of ROPs though, if 64 ROPs of the PS5 now became double issue like RDNA2/3 (which i think is plausible) that would put pixel fill rate at about double of PS5.
considering the die size, 4nm is pretty much confirmed.
6 nm, no dual issue, no ML block, RDNA 2, RT for sound only.
Ray Tracing for Sound?
Forgot about the PS5 hardware misinformation campaign at launch already? History tends to repeat itself.
Can't really do anything to stop that now, can we? X is filled with salty armchair intellectuals, who are nothing, but hurt that their favourite box didn't get a mid gen upgrade like their rival's did and the company that makes the former, instead decided to start ejaculating everywhere about a new gen instead, leaving their current gen to fend for itself like they've completely given all hope for it. So those guys try to ruin it for everyone else, because that's all their basement dwelling, middle aged fatass is good for it seems.
I corrected the output part in the follow up post.
Just got confirmation that I'll receive my Pro in about 3 hours
I believe you mean someone else corrected you.
You still going on?
