A good point. The guy has just been court ordered to pay Nintendo. As it stands right now, that whole $10 million is immediately payable. But, seeing as the guy (probably) doesn't have $10 million lying around, his next step will be to come to a payment agreement with Nintendo's legal or finance team. If, for whatever reason, they're not able to come to a mutual payment agreement, then Nintendo has the right to file a wage garnishment with the courts. Once they take that step, then yeah he'll automatically have 25-30% of his take home pay from his job given to Nintendo to go towards the outstanding balance until it's paid off (never).Isn't this like super speculation? People begin to act against Nintendo before they have even madr the first step. Some just love to lighten up their torches.
Criminal level copyright infringement shouldn’t result in potential lifetime destitution. The damage done to Nintendo, while quantifiable, is negligible in terms of their total value and profitability. Meanwhile, this guy will go to his grave owing Nintendo money and his criminal record will limit employment options.Maybe don’t do the crime in the first place?
The bro pleaded guilty, so it’s hard for me to feel bad for the criminal.
But again. Don’t be a criminal, and you don’t have to be treated like one the rest of your life.Criminal level copyright infringement shouldn’t result in potential lifetime destitution. The damage done to Nintendo, while quantifiable, is negligible in terms of their total value and profitability. Meanwhile, this guy will go to his grave owing Nintendo money and his criminal record will limit employment options.
Being guilty and being made an example of for the rest fo your life is quite different. We might as well start executing everybody, they did commit the crime after all.Maybe don’t do the crime in the first place?
The bro pleaded guilty, so it’s hard for me to feel bad for the criminal.
This is an excellent point.
But again. Don’t be a criminal, and you don’t have to be treated like one the rest of your life.
The person did the crime is not some toddler, if you try to screw with big multi billion company, they will come after you with full force, he should have known this might happen.Being guilty and being made an example of for the rest fo your life is quite different. We might as well start executing everybody, they did commit the crime after all.
And what about that 10 million sum? How did they reach that amount? It's a silly estimate very unlikely to be realistic, it's a corporation stomping on an individual because they can. Yeah, they did commit a crime, but two wrongs don't make a right.
Damn, he only made 320k over 7 years being part of this hacker group? Well, he got really fucked by Nintendo and the US Justice Department.
Oh well sucks for him, but I just don't really care about people who is part of a criminal scheme that profits from pirated material.
No, it’s the US. In Europe he would be fined liked 1000€, told to clean his shit, get some community service and be send home.. He's basically being made an example of, is this the middle ages?
The problem in this case is that regardless of what one did, should a corporation and their army of lawyers have free reign to exact unjust punishment as they see fit? They' re not the law, shouldn't the actual law protect individuals from situations like this?The person did the crime is not some toddler, if you try to screw with big multi billion company, they will come after you with full force, he should have known this might happen.
Is what Nintendo is doing fair? Absolulty not, but big companies are not your buddy, they have no problem fuck you over if you cross them.
It's easy to come up with some insane estimate with no basis on reality when it comes to piracy. How can you ruin a person's life based on damages you can't really prove?65 million in damages? If that's the case, he got off easy with Nintendo settling for a 55 million dollar loss
No but they will because they can but thats reality with big companies, it like messing with wild animal and not expecting to get hurt, just dont do the fucking crime.The problem in this case is that regardless of what one did, should a corporation and their army of lawyers have free reign to exact unjust punishment as they see fit? They' re not the law, shouldn't the actual law protect individuals from situations like this?
He made his own life choices, so why should we care? If this was done to someone innocent, then yeah it would be worrisome.It's easy to come up with some insane estimate with no basis on reality when it comes to piracy. How can you ruin a person's life based on damages you can't really prove?
That's what I was thinking. Dividing that up is like $45k a year, he must've made more money on some other side hustles or maybe he just genuinely loved doing what he did at that time and didn't mind getting paid so low.
You are barbaric if you would actually essentially financially imprison someone for a lifetime for something as meaningless and incorporeal as "perceived" lost profits, the jail time is enough as it isAnd everyone here would do the same as Nintendo. Everyone takes what they can in court. Everyone would do the same, including everyone on here. We are all inherently cruel under the right circumstances.
You shouldn't care about him individually. I don't. He has to deal with the consequences.He made his own life choices, so why should we care? If this was done to someone innocent, then yeah it would be worrisome.
The amount is complete bullshit. It’s like when there was a spate of people getting busted for hosting music on filesharing services, and the record companies claimed their losses equated to the retail price of each album multiplied by the number of downloads."don't do the crime if you can't do the time" and he did what? 65 million in damages? If that's the case, he got off easy with Nintendo settling for a 55 million dollar loss. At least they can make up some of that by using this guy as an example.
how do you think mod chips are made?When did Team Xecuter become a hacker group? They only made mod chips and console equipment right?
As others have said, they're using him as an example. I doubt they ever even try to collect anywhere near that amount. It's scare tactics 101.You shouldn't care about him individually. I don't. He has to deal with the consequences.
What you should care about is what I mentioned previously: recidivism. If you punish a criminal so harshly or in such a way that they can't properly rejoin society then you just push them back into illegal activities just to get by. Then they wind up causing more harm to more people.
That's not to say criminals shouldn't be punished. They should but it needs to be balanced and I think most people's issue here is that the fine is excessive. Though as someone else mentioned what he winds up paying might not be that high.
Through cracking?how do you think mod chips are made?
Not defending Nintendo, but when you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. Did people suddenly forget about consequences?
Depends on what he did, I don't know enough about this case. But the idea that lawyers would hold back when someone sold their products for millions, well, that's not realistic. Not saying it's the right thing to do.You are barbaric if you would actually essentially financially imprison someone for a lifetime for something as meaningless and incorporeal as "perceived" lost profits, the jail time is enough as it is
In this case the amount was plucked from thin air, by Nintendo, and not questioned at all by the court.I hate to be the one saying this, but recompense isn't about what the victim has, but what was lost.
If you do something that cost someone over$60M in losses, even if they are worth $6B, when caught, you owe them $60M.
And while hating big corpo may seem woke or whatever, I can never advocate for piracy like this.
Had this been done to Sony, his head would be demanded.Can't believe so many people are defending the guy.
This isn't your neighbor that downloaded the latest Game of Thrones episode, this is a guy that ran an illegal business making tons of money from it. He should've thought about the consequences.
Thats the pointRegardless of what he did, I'm not a supporter of corporations ruining people's entire lives financially for what is pennies to them. He's basically being made an example of, is this the middle ages?
The article said he earned $300k over 7 years, and Nintendo want him to sit in jail and pay $10 million. The punishment is kinda extreme.Can't believe so many people are defending the guy.
This isn't your neighbor that downloaded the latest Game of Thrones episode, this is a guy that ran an illegal business making tons of money from it. He should've thought about the consequences.
Emulation is not piracy.Agreed. Our legal system is sick. It promotes the idea of making an example out of people which is not remotely just. All he did was try to monetize a hack that was available for free elsewhere, but now he has to pay back 30x what he made or 25% of his life's earnings. It is crappy, but it is not as if he made Switch Piracy possible. FFS people are pirating Switch games via emulation on PC. I'm sure Nintendo wishes that emulator makers charged money so they could bake lawsuit income into their business plans.
More like fuck the US legal system, of course companies will take advantage of it25-30% of his income? Fuck off Nintendo, just drop it at this point. I’m sure he has learned his lesson.
I like how the victim trying to get back what’s owed to them are the bad guy in this scenario.More like fuck the US legal system, of course companies will take advantage of it
With how fluid the laws are today, today's model citizen can be tomorrows criminal. Thank God for crypto.This is why a lot of people keep trying to push for crypto.
Is the perfect way for criminals to hide their dirty earned money.