Yep.
It sucks because this game is a great foundation for a new series. They could do so many great things with a sequel and easily refine the flaws.
I'm fine with the game being a one and done, it's fun but not everything has to be a long series.
Yep.
It sucks because this game is a great foundation for a new series. They could do so many great things with a sequel and easily refine the flaws.
You know, of course it's not going to be for everyone, and it clearly isn't flawless. But I just wish people would decide based on the demo, and not dismissing it instantly.
Several impressions here and in other threads claim the game looks pretty good if not impressive for the platform, and opinions way more articulate than yours have elaborated on the complexity and specific details of each level compared to examples from VC or X-COM. Reasons need elaboration.Graphics just don't look good for a 3DS game. Levels look bland and uninteresting.
There's a reason it's getting ignore.
The game has an aesthetic I personally find so foul that I can't look past it, which is a shame because I enjoy Intelligent Systems games, X-Com, Valkyria Chronicles, and like my New 3DS plenty.
I just think the concept behind it is so goofy and unappealing that my interest is minimal. I'm glad some folks like it though.
Art wasnt doing much for me, but I enjoyed the demo, only reason why I haven't gotten this is because I got MH4U earlier and its eating whatever little free time I have this days.
I really don't consider controversial voice actors to be a problem because they have zero impact on the development, but then again, I realized I tend to separate the artist from the product very often.
others have frothed at the mouth under the misguided belief that its existence has somehow prevented a new Advance Wars from being released.
No reason to personally attack me. It's a game after all and I stated why I thought it was getting snubbed by the gaming public.Several impressions here and in other threads claim the game looks pretty good if not impressive for the platform, and opinions way more articulate than yours have elaborated on the complexity and specific details of each level compared to examples from VC or X-COM. Reasons need elaboration.
If anyone's got a 3DS, then playing the demo's the way to go for a hands-on impression.
Great write up. The turn and amiibo DLC does bother me but I do plan to eventually pick it up. I just can't justify it at $45 though.
The artstyle makes it look like shovelware.
If the criteria is "better than Valkyria Chronicles", you'll never buy another SRPG in your life.From what I can tell, Valkyria Chronicles did and does everything better and was only $20 on Steam. I just couldn't be bothered to buy it after playing the demo.
If the criteria is "better than Valkyria Chronicles", you'll never buy another SRPG in your life.
I did not know about Adam Baldwin.
That... I cant... Too slimy and disgusting.
I agree. Same reason I don't find Hyperdimension Neptunia appealing, they look like the lowest common denominator of their respective art styles. And I'm a big fan of Golden Age comics, but it is so.. bland. I think it's more of a character design issue.
How about that other new IP from Nintendo which people are excited about.New IP comes out.
"It's not any good. Should have made a Mario or Zelda game."
New Mario or Zelda game comes out.
"Why didn't you make a new IP?"
Nintendo all like "t-thanks".
Looks like a neat game, if I had more dosh in my budget right now I'd probably pick it up.
I think MonHun and Majora really hurt this game's chance to be a little enthusiast gem. That and the character models (the art style is overall fine, if not pretty good in some places, like the Library mission or (late game spoiler)).(Land of) Oz