Shadowlink
Member
Three great choices for the group stream this week.
I didn't hear him say that during Talking Syndrome, I think somebody in chat did, but I never heard him say it himself.
No he's said it's till good but his least favorite a couple timesNo way. Really? I thought he always said 3 was his least favourite.
A little different but I have a friend who works at Lucasfilm (she works on Star Wars stuff) and she eats all three meals a day at work and only goes home to sleep. What's the point of working somewhere cool if all you do is work? I only get to see her once a year when she comes out of the cave, and she can't even talk to anyone about what she does. I used to want to work in the movie business but not anymore, not after seeing her lifestyle.
he said it near the beginning of the Slime Rancher stream
True but I wish Kyle saved it for the next tournament.Thank god the voters used their heads this time
Windjammers is the only answer
so I was watching some show on MTV.com, and they still have a commercial playing on their media player for the GT App on Xbox360 with Kyle, Ian, and Elyse in it haha. wtf is Viacom even doing
Woah Ian has a gaf account! :OLol I'm standing in Viacom right now doing some editing for the VMAs, I showed your post to some of the people who also worked here in the GT days and we all had a good laugh. We all hope it just keeps playing in there forever haha.
Woah Ian has a gaf account! :O
I often find it harder to follow these supernatural fiascos, seems like it almost always ends up there though. It can still be good without aliens and time travel and stuff. At least I don't remember Regina's Wedding going there and it feels like a popular one. Otherwise it's like they are channelling David Cage in a lot of cases.
I often find it harder to follow these supernatural fiascos, seems like it almost always ends up there though. It can still be good without aliens and time travel and stuff. At least I don't remember Regina's Wedding going there and it feels like a popular one. Otherwise it's like they are channelling David Cage in a lot of cases.
It's a cash grab. It's a game that was already remastered 6 years ago.I do partially agree with Kyle about Shadow of the Colossus.
Not Ian, it's not a cash-grab. I think it's a passion project but I don't know if that'll be enough. Especially made me think when Kyle said "What's the motive of this being made?"
It's a cash grab. It's a game that was already remastered 6 years ago.
Cash grabs can still be passion projects. I'm pretty sure there are people who work on the annual Maddens, Fifas, ACs, and CoDs that are very passionate about them, doesn't make them any less of cash grabs.
What's the difference? A)It's still the same game. B)They are both attempts to make the game more palatable on the latest console, just on a different scale and budget.And this SotC is a remake and that was one a remaster.
It's a cash grab. It's a game that was already remastered 6 years ago.
Cash grabs can still be passion projects. I'm pretty sure there are people who work on the annual Maddens, Fifas, ACs, and CoDs that are very passionate about them, doesn't make them any less of cash grabs.
I wasn't trying to be controversial or edgy. But if you don't consider annual release cash grabs you probably wouldn't consider any game a cash grab ¯_(ツ_/¯Well, with that perspective you might as well call everything a cash-grab. Everything's a product to sell to someone so everything's a cash-grab.
It's a cash grab. It's a game that was already remastered 6 years ago.
Cash grabs can still be passion projects. I'm pretty sure there are people who work on the annual Maddens, Fifas, ACs, and CoDs that are very passionate about them, doesn't make them any less of cash grabs.
Around 6 hours til Kiwami time.. I'm gonna flip!
Won't wati for Kiwami 2, though before 6 comes out and start with 3, 4 and 5 right after. (Have to get a copy of 3 though, first. Around 25€ on amazon)
What's the difference? A)It's still the same game. B)They are both attempts to make the game more palatable on the latest console, just on a different scale and budget.
What does being remastered 6 years ago have to do with anything? This remake is no more a cash grab than that remaster was. They're both bringing an old game to a modern system.
TBH, I think the "cash grab" thing is pretty ridiculous. To use a recent example, I didn't hear Mario Kart 8 Deluxe being called a cash grab, even though it was far more blatant than this. The reality is, if Shu were only interested in money, he would've cancelled TLG years before its release, never given Bluepoint a budget to completely remake SotC and forgotten Team Ico even existed. Those projects (including the remasters and remakes) aren't just cash grabs, they're passion projects, particularly for Shu because Team Ico was his team for so long.
No artist I've ever encountered in my life has a "passion" for doing busywork on a carbon copy of somebody else's ideas.
I'll agree that I think it would be a stretch to call it a cash grab, though. There are easier ways for a publisher to make money, surely. It's more of a branding thing. A "get Shadow of the Colossus on three straight consoles because it's a legendary title that we should be able to continue to take advantage of without making a straight up sequel" kind of thing.
i'd argue that the creative process is hard to plan out accurately. some level of crunch is necessary if you're determined to make great pieces of art while also trying to meet the financial realities of making said art.
[...]
sometimes the vision you had in your head doesnt work out and you need to rework it. so youre either going to a) make something subpar that hits budget and timeline, b) something that is good but costs more than budgeted which can often result in less future funding, or c) you work harder for a period of time to hit budget/timeline/standards. its just a reality.
We live in a world where we get fan mods that are strictly about improving visuals in a game, and are offered up for free. That doesn't happen without passion, and does involve a ton of busywork. Unless you don't consider them artists for whatever reason.No artist I've ever encountered in my life has a "passion" for doing busywork on a carbon copy of somebody else's ideas.
Yea for at least two movies Damiani has given out movie passes during the group streamsI went out to see the one of the Ghibli films they are running through theaters now (Casle in the Sky) and I was surprised to see a Easy Allies logo included in a sponsor/ad list before the movie. Back door Ghibli deals?
PM me at the Easy Allies Twitter account and I can at least get you pointed in the right direction.So I need to discuss something important with one of the allies, and this would have to be someone involved in administration. Who should I contact and and how.
I know email is going to be recommended way of contacting, but I really need to know who and the exact email address, as last time I emailed about something important, and spent some time in formulating the email, I didn't get a reply for whatever reason (maybe I had the wrong email address, maybe my email got lost in the numerous emails they get, I don't know). But I really don't want my time & effort to go to waste again.
Yay for the Rabbids review. Think I'm gonna pick it up tomorrow, although I've never played XCOM. I'm a little bit nervous about whether the gameplay will click with me
Oh wow, that was the first Best of I've watched. Nice. Great ending. Also, Crash looks pretty damn good visually.
Man, it's getting hard to keep caught up on stuff besides Frame Trap and the podcast now that I'm going through a lot of old GT Full Playthrough Fridays.
Speaking of, did they accidentally ship Code Veronica X with the blooper reel version of the cutscenes? Motherfuckin' Steve Burnside...