GnomeChimpsky
Member
Academia will be interesting these coming years as it rids itself of all this garbage. I suspect there will be full-blown intellectual civil wars in some fields.
Maybe blame the people who made “Strong Black Woman” the DEI poster child. Blame the people who started race swapping characters and making every single fictional or historical setting as diverse as downtown LA and trying to cancel anyone who pointed out that it doesn’t make sense. Blame black Cleopatra.Cancel culture is alive and well.
See black person, review bomb, comment about woke propaganda. Rinse and repeat.
Sadly we wont be allowed that anymore, we need to be kept fighting each other.This so much.
They want you to believe the falsehoods that they believe, that some dude who had surgery is suddenly a biological woman.The JKR stuff was actually what opened my eyes a bit to the whole situation. I couldn't find one thing she said which was offensive against trans people. She literally said a trans woman is a "trans woman" and not a "woman", and that she happily fights for trans rights as well.
If that causes some global outrage I was shocked TBH.
Academia was the source, so it will probably be the last to purge it (if ever). It would be nice though.Academia will be interesting these coming years as it rids itself of all this garbage. I suspect there will be full-blown intellectual civil wars in some fields.
Hope this is going to pick up here in Canada too.At least in Europe, there is a rise of Left Conservative parties.
These are parties that are economically left wing, meaning socialist leaning. But that don't subscribe to the craziness of identity politics.
So they focus on worker rights and oppose Neo-Liberalism economics. While also opposing all that non-sense about sexual identity and that everything is racism.
And for our American members, please remember that socialism is not communism. And that Liberalism in Europe means economics.
So if you are going to comment on this trend, please take these aspects into consideration.
Still happening, add it to the long list of Ginger erasure.Blame the people who started race swapping characters
States saying “we do not want these sexually explicit materials in our public schools” is not the same as banning them. Those books are still readily available to buy if parents want their kids to have them. They have no business being in public schools - especially not elementary and middle schools.I only think it's going to get worse. Once GOP start banning books nation wide, rather than just in state.
It's not Man-at-Arms that's the ginger assault here, it's Bae Teela!Still happening, add it to the long list of Ginger erasure.
Idris Elba in Early Talks to Play Man-at-Arms in Amazon and Mattel's ‘Masters of the Universe’ Movie | Exclusive
Idris Elba is in early talks to play “Man at Arms” in the live-action “Masters of the Universe” movie based on the iconic Mattel franchise.www.thewrap.com
Nah, that shit was a legit concern. Me and my mates spent MANY a night playing KISS and other metal records backwards trying to summon demons. Just because it never worked doesn't mean we weren't for real.Spare me the propaganda and righteous indignation. Both the left and right have been trying to remove and censor media as long as I’ve been alive. I remember Joe Lieberman and Tipper Gore. I remember the Satanic Panic and the ludicrous claims against popular metal/rock music.
CNN •still• thinks it’s a good hill to die on.…
Trans women in women’s sports was the issue where I knew the movement had jumped the shark. Of all the hills to die on….
(sad progressive over here)
Just because it never worked doesn't mean we weren't for real
What's that old saying about an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind? If we just repeat their mistakes, we are perpetuating the problem, not solving it. In fact, it would amplify the problem, because we'd be endorsing cancel culture by using it against them. It would also turn us into hypocrites, since supposedly we are against cancel culture.
You musn't, or must be biased yourself if you think anything has improved under Musk other than the pendulum just swinging to other side and political content being gamed by the system.
"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
It sounds like it's probably about even.Don't try that shit with me, I acknowledge twitter used to be left leaning but at least before I could avoid politics stuff seeping into my things. Now it's right leaning and every damn buzzword and "thing you should be angry at" constantly seeps into pages now, not to mention the AI "curation" instead of trends being completely politics obsessed.
Cancel culture is alive and well.
See black person, review bomb, comment about woke propaganda. Rinse and repeat.
Here's the thing you guys don't seem to be grasping, pre-Musk, when Twitter was all left leaning or whatever, I rarely saw any politics on my feed or my recommendations. That's how I curated it, I'm there just for gaming, some music, retro tech, etc. that's how it was for me. I didn't follow any woke accounts or dumb shit like that.It sounds like it's probably about even.
Man, it sucks because I really like him as an actor and I think he’s a good pick for the role…but the race swapping shit (especially redheads) has been pushed so hard in Hollywood, there’s bound to be a backlash. Yet another movie turning into a battleground.Still happening, add it to the long list of Ginger erasure.
Idris Elba in Early Talks to Play Man-at-Arms in Amazon and Mattel's ‘Masters of the Universe’ Movie | Exclusive
Idris Elba is in early talks to play “Man at Arms” in the live-action “Masters of the Universe” movie based on the iconic Mattel franchise.www.thewrap.com
If on the other hand, you believe that transwomen deserve to be treated as human beings with the respect that we all want for our life choices, then I wholeheartedly agree with you. But they are still male. And always will be.
I am dead set against the trans movement when it tries to claim anything other than biological, scientific reality. And I make no apologies for that.
This isn't the issue though. It's putting MEN into women's prisons where rapes and pregnancies occur. It's putting MEN into the ring, pool, or field with women and seeing girls lose or get hurt. It's saying MEN could menstruate, could give birth, or all sorts of other nonsense.Being kind to 0.5% of the human population by calling them he or she according to their choices is not going to upend biological, scientific reality Funk. If you prefer you can conceptualize as them, within society, adopting male or female roles instead of their assigned roles at birth.
That wasn't really the problem. It was the VP of marketing or whatever saying they wanted to get away from "frat boy appeal". THAT is what got folks riled up. The trans influencer thing then became a signal of the audience bud apparently wanted instead of "frat boys" and they lost billions for it, deservedly so.Ah. Cancel culture... Like boycotting or cancelling Budweiser for giving a one time only case of beer to a trans content creator... That doesn't count tho... For some reason.
This isn't the issue though. It's putting MEN into women's prisons where rapes and pregnancies occur. It's putting MEN into the ring, pool, or field with women and seeing girls lose or get hurt. It's saying MEN could menstruate, could give birth, or all sorts of other nonsense.
If someone wants to dress a certain way, go for it. If they want to be addressed as "she/her" then put it in your bio and be done with it. If you have a full beard and a swinging dick, STAY OUT of my daughters locker room and bathroom!
It's just common sense, really. If the trans community just wants to be left alone like the rest of us, they gotta stop with the nonsense; crack a beer, and chill. Don't enter women's beauty parents, don't box women without their consent, don't accept shit like "women of the year" because it's ridiculous.
No I'm not. If you want to be reffered by the opposite sex then you can A. Look like the opposite sex and I'll never know (that's the goal, right?) or B. Ask politely and anyone who is not a jerk will likely comply.You can call them their chosen he or she and make the argument that they don't belong in the same competition for X reasons. You're just mudding the waters.
Actions have consequences, you don't get to try fuck someone over, then get to go on with 0 consequences.
Forgive and forget is generally what the guilty want, when they know they're in the wrong.
So yeh, fuck around and find out
Yeah Cancel Culture ain’t going anywhere .. Matt Gatez just found that out the hard way.
Also it’s funny how posters are mixing cancel culture with DEI practices… the 2 don’t even share a room apart from being practised by the liberals.
This is exactly what I’ve been thinking as well. The “true believers” are a small group of catty women with acid tongues. And for every one of them, there are 20 other people who just go along with it. Guys who don’t feel like getting nagged and scolded by their wives/girlfriends. People who don’t want to run afoul of the HR department. Dudes who think it’ll be easier to get laid if they just agree with the stuff she says. As well as people who have been bullied and now relish the opportunity to do the bullying for a change.If you want to use cancel culture against them, that's your prerogative. I won't do it, for the reasons I mentioned earlier (e.g., lowering yourself, amplifying the problem, hypocrisy).
I'll add one more. It'll probably sound misogynistic, but oh well. Cancel culture uses methods that overlap with women's characteristic style of expressing aggression - smears, reputation destruction, behind-the-back gossip, isolation, and exclusion. It's no coincidence that most SJWs are women. I'm no macho man, but engaging in cancel culture feels unmanly to me.
If you want to use cancel culture against them, that's your prerogative. I won't do it, for the reasons I mentioned earlier (e.g., lowering yourself, amplifying the problem, hypocrisy).
I'll add one more. It'll probably sound misogynistic, but oh well. Cancel culture uses methods that overlap with women's characteristic style of expressing aggression - smears, reputation destruction, behind-the-back gossip, isolation, and exclusion. It's no coincidence that most SJWs are women. I'm no macho man, but engaging in cancel culture feels unmanly to me.
I don't wanna engage in it, just see these retards get a taste of their own shitty medicine.
Back in my day you talk smack to someone, guess what happens....?
The least that van happen is they get a time out and see what it's like, sometimes the only way some people learn is with metaphorical punch in the mouth, it humbles people real quick, and males you reaccess how you navigate life
Cause/effect
If you don't want to engage in cancel culture, then we have no argument. That's what the conversation was about. Someone (not you) said why don't we use cancel culture against them. I responded, no, for reasons I explained. You posted in opposition to me, seemingly giving support to the idea of using cancel culture. But if that's not what you're talking about, then we can drop it.
I'm fine if the left wants to eat itself. They seem to be doing a pretty good job of it lately.
I agree that actions have consequences. I was never saying we should do nothing, just forgive and forget. I was saying don't let your desire for justice/retribution cause you to become exactly what you despise.
Still was one of the craziest cancellation attempts ever. Dude said the most PG milquetoast joke and you had a bunch of betas and lunatics feigning outrage just to virtue signal to their perceived ideological in crowd. It was one of the most pathetic displays of loser behavior I've seen. The guy didn't remotely do or say anything wrong.Remember...Colin was cancelled becasue he said "Peace and Quiet" on the International Woman´s Day.
First: Facts
Second:
Academia was the source, so it will probably be the last to purge it (if ever). It would be nice though.
No it doesn't count. Choosing to not engage with something is different to trying to stop others engaging with it.Ah. Cancel culture... Like boycotting or cancelling Budweiser for giving a one time only case of beer to a trans content creator... That doesn't count tho... For some reason.
I agree. Except for the agenda part. It's for the money.I know you're trying to be witty and all but all hollywood has to do is stop replacing white characters with black actors in the name of "diversity".
Hollywood isn't doing it to make the material better but to push an agenda.
You realise you’re just feeding their mental illness though right?You can call them their chosen he or she and make the argument that they don't belong in the same competition for X reasons. You're just mudding the waters.
You're lucky then. I had a Twitter just for advertising and only to Sonic fans. Seeing the political crap was insufferable, so I deleted it and will never go back.Don't try that shit with me, I acknowledge twitter used to be left leaning but at least before I could avoid politics stuff seeping into my things. Now it's right leaning and every damn buzzword and "thing you should be angry at" constantly seeps into pages now, not to mention the AI "curation" instead of trends being completely politics obsessed.
Yup.Progressives don't even realize thar their movement would be in a much better place if they focused on winning hearts and minds rather than canceling everybody that didn't toe the line.
They spent so much time crying wolf that people shrug now that we have some actual wolves.
Need more patience is really part of the key. Giving zero leeway to anyone not passing their purity tests, despite plenty of evidence that people can change over time to become more accepting of what was or is considered a progressive ideal.Progressives don't even realize thar their movement would be in a much better place if they focused on winning hearts and minds rather than canceling everybody that didn't toe the line.
They spent so much time crying wolf that people shrug now that we have some actual wolves.
Problem with progressive loudmouths is lack of experience and tolerance. You can tell they are loners and dont have good jobs working at companies.Need more patience is really part of the key. Giving zero leeway to anyone not passing their purity tests, despite plenty of evidence that people can change over time to become more accepting of what was or is considered a progressive ideal.
Even seen lots of nastiness towards people praising someone who changed. “Not gonna praise someone for eventually doing the right thing” kind of bullshit.
Just so dumb to think it wouldn’t cause a big backlash. I think a lot of it stems from the belief that they are the majority and so can just be nasty. Problem with they is even if it was true at one point in time all the nastiness and purity testing is going to filter out many folks to not be support anymore. Basic psychology really.
Being kind to 0.5% of the human population by calling them he or she according to their choices is not going to upend biological, scientific reality Funk. If you prefer you can conceptualize as them, within society, adopting male or female roles instead of their assigned roles at birth.
I expected most of gaf to be quite abusive to this minority, but not you Funk
Your words sadden me.
Yeah for real. Whole lot of people told they were smart who aren’t too lol. I’m working with w Gen Z girl who is a junior consultant who asked me to mentor her and our meetings are basically her just going “I don’t get how, like what do I like, do, to like… get promoted?”Problem with progressive loudmouths is lack of experience and tolerance. You can tell they are loners and dont have good jobs working at companies.
That's what happens when my legs go numb on the toilet.This is what I see every time I close my eyes: