Humdinger
Gold Member
He has some links to follow in the OP. I don't know how detailed they are about sources, though.Just out of curiosity how are these estimates done? What's the starting data here?
He has some links to follow in the OP. I don't know how detailed they are about sources, though.Just out of curiosity how are these estimates done? What's the starting data here?
GamePass subs will decline as the Xbox installbase declines though.
Eventually people will leave the Xbox eco-system and move to Playstation and Nintendo on consoles.
This will inevitably lead to a decline in GamePass installbase, so most likely they will have to increase the price of the sub-fee, which in turn will make the installbase decline even more.
Unless somehow Playstation and Nintendo will allow GP on their platforms, but I don't see that happening.
It can only go downhill for Xbox from here on out.
They'll have to become a proper 3rd publisher at some point.
If not for series S... the overall numbers would be much worse today.I said Series S was a bad idea from the start, but Xbox diehards thought it could turn the tide
And some would tell you that the next ace up MS sleeve is jumpstarting the next-gen early and releasing the most powerful console ever in 2025. And everything will change then. Its going to be the best place to play GTA6. Sony would be fucked.I've been saying for months it looked like end of generation numbers for Series consoles...but dayum.
Gamepass the Xbox killerI said Series S was a bad idea from the start, but Xbox diehards thought it could turn the tide
The fact it still curb stomps Xbox is both impressive and embarrassing. Xbox has collapsed in America too.Switch is impressive as fuck.
What fucked Xbox this generation, didn't start this generation.What went wrong for Xbox this generation? I know lack of software slowed things down early on but Sony hasn’t been killing it in that regard lately either. Game Pass looks great on paper. Shouldn’t it have moved more consoles? Are there that many people that moved to PC when MS went PC day one? I did not think Xbox was going to surpass Sony and Nintendo but I did think it was going to close the gap. I do believe the things I mentioned hurt Xbox but I think they lost their identity and doing so lost those that were not already Xbox fans.
Sony allows Ubisoft+ and EA Play on their platform. I think that the precedence is there for them to allow Game Pass as well, but only in the event that Microsoft goes full third party.
Switch, like the DS, is that kinda product that will always sell well. There are always moms and dads looking to buy a switch for their newly turned 7 or 8-year-old.The fact it still curb stomps Xbox is both impressive and embarrassing. Xbox has collapsed in America too.
And that gamepass doesn't contain other 3rd party titles. I don't believe Sony wants gamepass destroying their 3rd party revenue.
I have called this out before too.Sony allows Ubisoft+ and EA Play on their platform. I think that the precedence is there for them to allow Game Pass as well, but only in the event that Microsoft goes full third party.
Yeah it's like the first thing you buy your kid when they're old enough for games.Switch, like the DS, is that kinda product that will always sell well. There are always moms and dads looking to buy a switch for their newly turned 7 or 8-year-old.
If tracked, I am sure people will discover that it's probably in the top 5 most sought-after birthday presents for 7-12 years olds.
US, UK, Japan, Mainland Europe
Mainland Europe : Hardware sales cover Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.
US: IB Estimates
Mainland Europe Jan : IB Estimates (Hardware sales cover Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland)
Mainland Europe Feb : IB Estimates (Hardware sales cover Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland)
UK Jan: IB Estimates
UK Feb: IB Estimates
Japan : Gematsu (Famitsu Sales)
Yes. I do think that's the direction Game Pass is heading. Only ActiBlizz/Bethesda/Xbox Game Studios titles.
GamePass isn't going to continue as it is today forever. Eventually, you'll only see MS + ABK + Bethesda games on it. It will decline though over time.
The question of whether people will leave the Xbox ecosystem is an interesting one. I think many people are tied into the ecosystem. A large percentage will stick it out well longer than is reasonable. Also many will go to PC rather than Sony.
GamePass as it exists in the future may end up on PlayStation and maybe even Nintendo.
The thing about 3rd party publishers is that everyone will probably have their own streaming storefront in the future. We're looking at a post console world. Gen Z and younger don't care enough about the living room. They want their games wherever they want to play them. This is why Sony and Microsoft are going to get into handhelds.
Not much to boast if your competitor in a triathlon is a withering corpse.
Well it's not like Sony have been giving the maximum of reasons for those Xbox console expats to get a PlayStation over a PC. I mean, considering a good deal of Sony's own moves with PC seemingly increasingly at the expense of their own console hardware.
The good news is that Sony can make adjustments because, quite frankly, there is room for PlayStation consoles and the console market as a whole to grow. But they have to stop being narrow-minded thinking their only actual competition is Xbox. Not much to boast if your competitor in a triathlon is a withering corpse.
I think this is more of a case of Netflix shitting the bed and not getting their app on the device than Nintendo saying no we don't want you, you don't make us money. Otherwise Hulu, Crunchyroll, and YouTube wouldn't be on the device. It looks like Twitch and Funimation used to be on it, but aren't there anymore. Considering the age of the device, I am not surprised to see support starting to end, or the newer streaming services not bother to put their apps on the device at this point, but I bet they will for the next Switch.It's not really absurd.
Nintendo wants people using a switch to be playing their games, not doing things that aren't generating Nintendo money.
Nintendo knows these people have phones and can utilize their phone for netflix. Adding it to the Switch doesn't really generate much extra value for them.
I think this is more of a case of Netflix shitting the bed and not getting their app on the device than Nintendo saying no we don't want you, you don't make us money. Otherwise Hulu, Crunchyroll, and YouTube wouldn't be on the device. It looks like Twitch and Funimation used to be on it, but aren't there anymore. Considering the age of the device, I am not surprised to see support starting to end, or the newer streaming services not bother to put their apps on the device at this point, but I bet they will for the next Switch.
It's crazy to see the Switch still going this strong, and with no permanent cut to its price. Its no wonder Nintendo isn't in a hurry to push out the successor.
I get that there is a cost to maintaining and getting these apps on the device, which might be why Netflix said fuck that I suppose, but that would be moreso coming from Netflix, not Nintendo. I listed three other videos streaming apps that are there, so it's not like Nintendo is hard saying no to them all because it's not worth it for them.You have to consider the cost of developing apps for custom hardware/software and maintaining, patching, and updating the applications and what the upside is. Only to what have to develop a new app 7 years later for a new device?
Especially when you consider a device that doesn't have its own data, so it can only be used with wifi and if someone has wifi, they probably have a host of other means to watch Netflix.
It doesn't make a lot of sense for Nintendo or Netflix.
Switch is a handheld. Japan is a huge handheld focused country. If you've ever looked for an apartment in Japan, it's SMALL and EXPENSIVE. So, this makes a lot of sense. Not many will have space for an entertainment center to house the PS5. Even the slim is still huge.Switch is impressive as fuck.
Nice try downplaying it. It's impressive.Switch is a handheld. Japan is a huge handheld focused country. If you've ever looked for an apartment in Japan, it's SMALL and EXPENSIVE. So, this makes a lot of sense. Not many will have space for an entertainment center to house the PS5. Even the slim is still huge.
Downplaying what? I could care less about sales numbers. I don't have Sony stock. You need some time off of here.Nice try downplaying it. It's impressive.
Couldn’t care less*Downplaying what? I could care less about sales numbers. I don't have Sony stock. You need some time off of here.
Portable Gaming Rules in Japan
One of the more noticeable differences between the East and the West is the prevalence of the handheld console. The popularity of handhelds in Japan is fairly understandable. For one thing, the high population density makes open space one of the island country's most precious commodities. Also...kotaku.com
Anytime there is talk about sales data on these boards about the Switch, there seems to always be asterisks people want to attach to its numbers. "Well sure the switch has sold X number, but only *because Japan loves handhelds or *only babies and small children get it from their parents, *it's a handheld it doesn't count" and whatever other reason you occasionally see. I wasn't around this place back in the PS2 and DS days, but were there mental gymnastics regarding their numbers like the switch seems to get?Couldn’t care less*
And yes, you’re downplaying it and are trying to justify why it outsells the PS5.
It's still competitive. In any case my point still stands. You can do your own research. The average apartment is 100 SQFT. I lived there for a few months on a project for Raytheon. I could barely fit a rice maker let alone an entertainment center. Your lack of experience is showing here.Couldn’t care less*
And yes, you’re downplaying it and are trying to justify why it outsells the PS5.
UK is only one country. Those sorts of hardware numbers are fairly normal given the situaiton (Japan punches above its weight in this regard).Whats up with UK, always that low?
Switch's abillity to be used as a home console is also a big reason for its success in Japan, its not just the portable functionality.Switch is a handheld. Japan is a huge handheld focused country. If you've ever looked for an apartment in Japan, it's SMALL and EXPENSIVE. So, this makes a lot of sense. Not many will have space for an entertainment center to house the PS5. Even the slim is still huge.
And here we arrive at what you were truly trying to do all along: downplaying the Switch’s sales numbers because it’s doing better than the PS5.It's still competitive. In any case my point still stands. You can do your own research. The average apartment is 100 SQFT. I lived there for a few months on a project for Raytheon. I could barely fit a rice maker let alone an entertainment center. Your lack of experience is showing here.
More or less. I'm sure most are simply using it as a handheld. Handhelds in general are super popular in Japan. That's why the 3DS did so well for so long.UK is only one country. Those sorts of hardware numbers are fairly normal given the situaiton (Japan punches above its weight in this regard).
Switch's abillity to be used as a home console is also a big reason for its success in Japan, its not just the portable functionality.
Switch is called a hybrid for a reason though.Anytime there is talk about sales data on these boards about the Switch, there seems to always be asterisks people want to attach to its numbers. "Well sure the switch has sold X number, but only *because Japan loves handhelds or *only babies and small children get it from their parents, *it's a handheld it doesn't count" and whatever other reason you occasionally see. I wasn't around this place back in the PS2 and DS days, but were there mental gymnastics regarding their numbers like the switch seems to get?
GamePass is good for the sort of person who posts on NeoGAF, who will want to play and buy a lot of games over time. But if you just want to play one game, or play the games your friends are playing, it's not a good deal. Even if you love a game on GamePass, from Microsoft, like Age of Empires, it makes more sense just to buy it than spend $10-$15 a month forever.What went wrong for Xbox this generation? I know lack of software slowed things down early on but Sony hasn’t been killing it in that regard lately either. Game Pass looks great on paper. Shouldn’t it have moved more consoles? Are there that many people that moved to PC when MS went PC day one? I did not think Xbox was going to surpass Sony and Nintendo but I did think it was going to close the gap. I do believe the things I mentioned hurt Xbox but I think they lost their identity and doing so lost those that were not already Xbox fans.
What went wrong for Xbox this generation? I know lack of software slowed things down early on but Sony hasn’t been killing it in that regard lately either. Game Pass looks great on paper. Shouldn’t it have moved more consoles? Are there that many people that moved to PC when MS went PC day one? I did not think Xbox was going to surpass Sony and Nintendo but I did think it was going to close the gap. I do believe the things I mentioned hurt Xbox but I think they lost their identity and doing so lost those that were not already Xbox fans.
Just live in the PS5 box.It's still competitive. In any case my point still stands. You can do your own research. The average apartment is 100 SQFT. I lived there for a few months on a project for Raytheon. I could barely fit a rice maker let alone an entertainment center. Your lack of experience is showing here.
I used those two as examples since they sit as the highest selling video game consoles ("platforms" if we're splitting hairs) of all time. Just curious if their numbers have asterisks associated to them: something like *PS2 was only sold to people who wanted it as a DVD player, or the *DS sales don't matter because handhelds shouldn't count when we see overall sales for these systems. Basically, I don't see the need to split hairs when comparing all these videos game devices, when playing video games is the primary function for them. Are some of those reasons that the platform may have sold many of their units? Sure, but it doesn't mean that is the only reason they are successful, it's pretty much downplaying that success for whatever reason.Switch is called a hybrid for a reason though.
Nobody compared PS2 and DS in a console discussion.
Handhelds are super popular in Japan when they get exclusive games in big franchises like Kingdom Hearts, Dragon Quest, Monster Hunter etc.More or less. I'm sure most are simply using it as a handheld. Handhelds in general are super popular in Japan. That's why the 3DS did so well for so long.
Yes, they have.
In addition to first-party exclusives, many of which are system sellers (Miles Morales, Horizon FW, Gran Turismo, God of War Ragnarok, Spider-Man 2) Sony has made obviously intentional moves to fill the gaps in their release schedule with third-party deals (Final Fantasy) and at least one second-party hit (Helldivers 2).
This is where someone will say, "But those titles aren't all PS5 exclusives and third party isn't what I'm talking about!"
No one cares about that except for enthusiast boards. Does the PS5 have a much, much more attractive library of exclusive or semi-exclusive content? Yes. Is there literally anything Xbox offers that cannot be found on PC? No. I love my Series X, as I haven't been a PC guy, but even I've made the decision to move away to only Sony hardware + PC + Nintendo next time around.
There simply is zero, and I mean zero reason to own an Xbox right now if you're willing to get a PC. And Gamepass? A good price, but a bad value, as I've detailed many times in the past. No one can play all those games, so the value proposition is actually quite bad, even if the price is "good" for what you can access.
You can't eat everything on the Cheesecake Factory menu, you know?
The third party stuff is huge. When I got an Xbox it was partially because of Gears and Mass Effect. If it was just Gears I'm not sure I would have done it. Then Tales of Vesperia came out and I also loved it. I have no idea why they stopped money hatting 3rd party stuff it was working.
And Gamepass? A good price, but a bad value, as I've detailed many times in the past. No one can play all those games, so the value proposition is actually quite bad, even if the price is "good" for what you can access.
I still don't think PC is a direct competitor for Console. At least not today.
I think where Sony can get growth is by releasing a PS5 handheld, which will probably sell better in Japan than the console and will sell considerably units in the West. I'd say a portable PS5 could sell anywhere between 50-100 million units, bringing the overall number of PS5s sold at the end of the life cycle to anywhere from 150-200 million units.
Porting games to PC isn't going to significantly hamper that at all.
I used those two as examples since they sit as the highest selling video game consoles ("platforms" if we're splitting hairs) of all time. Just curious if their numbers have asterisks associated to them: something like *PS2 was only sold to people who wanted it as a DVD player, or the *DS sales don't matter because handhelds shouldn't count when we see overall sales for these systems. Basically, I don't see the need to split hairs when comparing all these videos game devices, when playing video games is the primary function for them. Are some of those reasons that the platform may have sold many of their units? Sure, but it doesn't mean that is the only reason they are successful, it's pretty much downplaying that success for whatever reason.
What went wrong for Xbox this generation? I know lack of software slowed things down early on but Sony hasn’t been killing it in that regard lately either. Game Pass looks great on paper. Shouldn’t it have moved more consoles?
For sure on the bolded, and that's more so where I have an issue with it. Don't get me wrong, I am definitely not that emotionally invested in it all, its just more me smiling to myself thinking "I wonder how long until the reasons posts appear" whenever a sales threads pop up. I absolutely acknowledge all of these reasons contribute to these console's success, but they aren't the sole reason they are successful, and feel like it is absolutely framed that way many of the times. Whether it's the PS2, DS, Switch etc, etc, they all earned their success on their own merits, by having great games/game libraries, and being desirable products worth investing your money and time into first and foremost. I do think it's often less a neutral observation, and more so downplaying when you see the reasons posts begin to appear. It is what it is I suppose /shrug.It's less "splitting hairs" and more providing context why some systems may be doing better than others in the same region. Though, I think the way it's framed goes a long way to determine if the context's being used neutrally or as a way to boast one preferred system over another. It's the latter which gets out of hand very quickly. There's a connotative difference between saying Switch's sales success in Japan is partly due to it being a portable, versus saying the Switch is only doing well in Japan because it's a portable.
The former IMO is a neutral observation, the latter can be taken as a negative dismissal/downplay.
For sure on the bolded, and that's more so where I have an issue with it. Don't get me wrong, I am definitely not that emotionally invested in it all, its just more me smiling to myself thinking "I wonder how long until the reasons posts appear" whenever a sales threads pop up. I absolutely acknowledge all of these reasons contribute to these console's success, but they aren't the sole reason they are successful, and feel like it is absolutely framed that way many of the times. Whether it's the PS2, DS, Switch etc, etc, they all earned their success on their own merits, by having great games/game libraries, and being desirable products worth investing your money and time into first and foremost. I do think it's often less a neutral observation, and more so downplaying when you see the reasons posts begin to appear. It is what it is I suppose /shrug.
No it started 2010 with the 360. That was when hardcore games died and they focused on casual games.What fucked Xbox this generation, didn't start this generation.
To be more specific, the fuckery you are seeing this generation, happened in its entirety last gen. It has just taken it this long to be undeniably obvious. And it was Gamepass, day 1 release on Xbox and PC. They literally told everyone, you do not need to buy an Xbox but even worse, they conditioned people into thinking, you shouldn't have to buy games either.
It worked.
I had no issues with my PS3 Slim, but did have 2 Xbox 360s fail.Tbf, my OG PS3 YLOD'd twice.
Well, PC is a more direct "indirect" competitor I would say. It is not competing with PlayStation in a direct blatant manner Xbox does, but in addition to its more indirect approach, it is also a more effective 'indirect' competitor directly, if that makes sense.
As for a PS5 portable, I do think it would do very well in the market. That's probably why there are rumors of a new PS handheld but for the PS6 gen rather than PS5, and probably leveraging some scaled-down PS6 tech in a portable device format. However there's no way I'd see any future PS handheld without its own dedicated library of games pushing 100 million units. Just not going to happen. 50 million could be doable but that would depend a LOT on what the appeal in Japan is.
IMO a big part for Switch's Japan dominance hasn't just been because it's a hybrid portable, it's also because of the 1P software appealing very strongly to that market (as well as globally). Currently Sony don't have the 1P that would appeal to Japan as strongly as Nintendo's, and while they have some IP which could, like Astrobot, they'd need to build them up with transmedia efforts and a few more releases because that's going up against IP with decades of nostalgia and cultural zeitgeist cache like Mario and Pokemon.
As for how PC would affect that, I do genuinely think if the current PC strategy remains as-is or gets more aggressive (ports with shorter windows or Day 1 for non-GAAS titles for example), that will severely hamper the appeal of a PlayStation portable (let alone the console). At that point the PlayStation handheld would have no content differentiation against something like a Steam Deck, which would have a larger library of differentiated content (due to PC exclusives) not available on a PlayStation console or handheld. Not to mention the Steam Deck would have other functionality the PlayStation portable would most likely lack.
There is just no way a console or portable based around a console with a shared library, wins against platforms like PC without leveraging exclusives as content differentiators along with as many matching hardware features or unique hardware features to PC as possible. Nintendo gets this, Sony doesn't seem to. But maybe, hopefully, they are in the process of implementing changes that show they do, too.
Seven years old and still selling 50% as the market leader all while using hardware from 2012 and very rarely selling hardware or software at anything other than full price.Switch is impressive as fuck.