Geez, it's that bad? I think it's on Amazon Prime videos even, but I've never really felt compelled to watch it. I think I chipped in 10 bucks for his IndieGogo or whatever he used to fund it, though.
The whole shit storm surrounding the movie is what led people to believe that he was sexist. There was also a small group of people that would say anyone that didn't like the movie was sexist.
it's hard to have respect for anyone who calls themselves a critic and then refuses to actually see the things they are talking about. imo this is a dealbreaker.
The dude only stated why he didn't like the look of the new movie, and suddenly he's sexist?people want to bury their heads in the sand when it's someone they like. whatever.
The dude only stated why he didn't like the look of the new movie, and suddenly he's sexist?
You are fuckin pathetic...
I think his video was pretty misguided, but the reaction to it was even more disgusting and no one (save a few people like that Comic Book Girl -i think she's called that?-) looked at it reasonably. They just assumed and pointed fingers.
.
It's all so clear to me now! All my life! I've been a fool!"look of the new movie" is obviously just code for "i hate women and want them back as second class citizens"
The AVGN was the reason I began to be a regular Gametrailers.com user. Anyone here remember those years where Rolfe had us on a constant new AVGN episode every other week? He had that grueling schedule for two full years releasing two a month. Easily his most prolific time but also his most difficult. He still managed to pull a lot of great ones during that time. His work schedule must've been horrific.
even if there was no sexism involved (which i find hard to believe), it was still an extremely toxic and harmful situation at the time, and he piled on.
this is apparently meant to be an appreciation thread, so i'll leave it alone, but people haven't forgotten his part in that mess. plus, like someone else mentioned, he's a big part of the awful whiny/obnoxious/angry attitude that plagues the gaming world.
The Godzillathon was my favorite. I eagerly await his review of Shin Godzilla.Have been watching it all along. I also tune into Cinemassacre's Monster Madness reviews every year.
People make a bigger deal about the Ghostbusters thing than they need to. As stated, he had to say something to his fans about not reviewing the new movie given his love for the series. So for like, 2-5 minutes? He states why he doesn't want to review/see the movie (while not mentioning gender at all, just film quality), and then spends the rest of the video rambling about the franchise and the original ideas for a Ghostbusters 3 back in the 90s. His video came out before the hatred for the new film really hit its peak, and...as someone who has watched James' shit for years, it's clear he can be pretty oblivious about what's "hip and happenin'" on the Internet at times. Guess it's a mixture of being too busy and not being nerdy enough to read shit online all the time. I honestly believe he had no idea the controversy was so huge when he made/uploaded his video. He probably would have done things a lot differently if he had known there was such a huge controversy about the movie and the gender of the actors...because, again, he didn't mention the gender of the actors being a problem at all.
Damn, that's hard to hear. Is it really that bad? I mean, I'd heard it is, more than once, but I still can't believe it. It's his life passion, after all.Ugh, it's one of the worst movies I've ever seen. I don't regret supporting James, because I'm happy he was able to achieve his dream of directing a full-length film, but it was such a huge fucking waste of my time to actually watch. I didn't like a single thing about it.
Damn, that's hard to hear. Is it really that bad? I mean, I'd heard it is, more than once, but I still can't believe it. It's his life passion, after all.
Nah, actually I believe it. If AVGN fans are criticizing it, it must be truly bad. I just don't want to believe...
I honestly don't think he said anything wrong and I believe he would've said the same thing if the movie was starred by men. His reasons were solid in the context. I can relate to be honest, not for ghostbusters but I refused to watch Batman vs superman since it was announced.people want to bury their heads in the sand when it's someone they like. whatever.
I first saw AVGN when I was in 8th grade, I believe. Goddamn, it's been 9 years...
I loved the first 5 or so years of AVGN. I don't know if I'm in the minority on this, but I always favored his videos where he just played the game and made jokes at it's expense, as opposed to some of them where there is some "story" happening in the middle. The fight scenes and whatnot didn't interest me.
I haven't seen any of his recent stuff ever since he started making sub-par LPs with Mike that are similar to the Game Grumps (in that, they just talk about whatever and have no structure or effort put into them).
Favorite episodes are the Silver Surfer one and Plumbers Don't Wear Ties. I doubt the latter would even be known by nearly anyone online if it weren't for his video of it.
Started watching his video in 2008 but I stopped after his 100th episode as I was getting bored of the whole "Grrr this things sucks" gimmick that everyone was running to the ground so I stopped watching his video but also the Nostalgia Critic, Linkara and many others.
This critique is reserved for those who offer opinions on things they haven't experienced, about the things they haven't experienced.
James didn't say "oh the second act is terrible." He thought all the prerelease info and trailers and such were terrible, and critiqued them. He didn't critique anything he didn't see, and that was the point of the video. He wasn't going to see it and wasn't going to critique it. That's proper critic behavior. Don't give a movie a bad review if you didn't even watch it...and thus he didn't watch it and didn't review it.
this isn't proper critic behavior. this is someone flat-out refusing to do their job.
thing is, this is the only movie he has ever done that with. unless i am wrong? has he put out other "i will not see this movie" videos before? the fact that this is the only thing to get that treatment makes it a special case.
who knows maybe he would have liked parts of the movie. assuming it would be bad so why bother is shitty critiquing. he judged a movie solely on the trailer hype and press. literally judging a book by its cover.
this isn't proper critic behavior. this is someone flat-out refusing to do their job.
thing is, this is the only movie he has ever done that with. unless i am wrong? has he put out other "i will not see this movie" videos before? the fact that this is the only thing to get that treatment makes it a special case.
who knows maybe he would have liked parts of the movie. assuming it would be bad so why bother is shitty critiquing. he judged a movie solely on the trailer hype and press. literally judging a book by its cover.
His job isn't to review every movie out there. As far as we are concerned, his job isn't to review any movie at all. He has a few youtube channels, he chooses what he speaks about or not in them, what he makes videos about or not. He gave his reasons (which I thought were pretty dumb to be fair) and explained his position. What does it matter if it is a special case or a common case for him? Because you have an assumption of what it "really" means that he picked this movie to skip and had the nerve to talk about it?
Maybe he would've loved the movie, maybe not, but that has nothing to do with anything. He didn't want to do it, and people went as overboard as labeling him and claim even in this thread he was a part of some sort of "problem movement" to reject this movie because it has women in it. He didn't judge a movie based on its cover, he decided not to judge it because he believed it he wouldn't enjoy it. That's anyone's prerogative, and I'm pretty sure something you do all the time, unless you watch every single movie that is ever released and give your opinion on it.
And no, again, his job isn't to review this or any movie you want. He has no obligation to do it, full stop. It's amazing people fighting for equality and rights wouldn't think of awarding him that chance or giving him the benefit of the doubt at least (especially because it's not like he's making alt-right. misogynistic videos every other week), even if he is "wrong".
his entire reason for not seeing this movie is that it's a reboot. it looked like a shitty comedy horror reboot.
AVGN's entire schtick is shitty comedy horror regurgitation! he does this himself, constantly!
look, he has some very good qualities, and can really get into the minutiae of the mechanics of a game, and can say revealing things about player interaction. but he relies very much on referencing old stuff. on regurgitating culture. and scatological humor too. both are things that were reasons why not to see this new Ghostbusters. it had stupid throw up humor in it. it was relying so much on referencing old stuff.
but ultimately, he is a public figure. he is youtube famous because the public finds him interesting. he is influential. he must have realized this would influence other people.
imo he promoted a dangerous anti-intellectualism.
this is what it comes down to for me. telling people to close themselves off from a potential experience. promoting a kind of self-censorship. why?
this is anti-intellectual.
his entire reason for not seeing this movie is that it's a reboot. it looked like a shitty comedy horror reboot.
[...]
imo he promoted a dangerous anti-intellectualism.
this is what it comes down to for me. telling people to close themselves off from a potential experience. promoting a kind of self-censorship. why?
this is anti-intellectual.
- "It's another hunk of plastic!, who made this thing?"
- LJN Toys Ltd.
- "Son of a bitch"
It gets me every time.
That's neat info. Was the one that James had broken or all of them run like crap on most games?That always bums me out, because there's a great bit of trivia behind that invention. LJN didn't make it, they just distributed it in North America.
Actually, that balance board thing was the first ever product from the Amiga team at Commodore. They released a few gaming peripherals before releasing the Amiga 1000 after being purchased by Commodore, and that balancing board was their first ever retail product. They actually used it when developing the Amiga 1000 as a meditation device. The thing has an IMU inside that lets it detect changes in orientation. They had a practice called Guru Meditation where, to calm down while debugging problems in the system, they'd play a game that measured how long they could sit still and meditate. That is the reason that peripheral exists.
LJN eventually released it for the NES in North America, but it really doesn't make sense without the meditation software in the first place.
Incidentally, this is why when an Amiga crashes, the "blue screen" reads "Guru Meditation" at the top. It was an inside joke.