Do you really want me to post those Rog Ally X battery life benchmarks?Most of his Switch 2 rumors match what everyone else is currently saying when he said it nearly a year ago. Cut him some slack on this at least. Of course taking this with a grain of salt as one should.
Compared to less than an hour you get with the PC handhelds at 15w. Even Steam deck gets you two at best and they have much bigger batteries. The more powerful these handhelds get, the more battery they consume. Miss the Gameboy days of 10+ hours on 2 AA batteries.
If true, on every level Nvidia's chipset is better. Equal power at lower wattage is saying a lot as the Hz rate difference would be huge going from 5w to 15w. Of course like with the Switch most likely a dev could increase that if they wanted to. Super Mario Odyssey runs at a higher wattage than most games on the Switch.
I mean interms of hardware and there's nothing stopping Nintendo from using the those features with their own spin on it.DLSS and FSR are not comparable, and given the power envelope, this thing is going to rely a lot on upscaling, is my guess.
You can always undervolt and underclock5watt? Does nvidia have a 5 w chip?
With what they did on Switch 1 hardware, I can't wait to see them cook with this thing. With how like Portal Collection and Metroid Prime looked on Switch 1, what are we even talking about. We WILL see some magic on this thing and it won't just come form Nintendo. Handheld will always be a place where efficiency shines.People think DLSS will save them on a mobile CPU with a 5W TDP lol
Just wave that magic wand around Nintendo!!
With higher wattage comes not only demand for a bigger battery, which costs more, but also bigger fans, which also cost more. And with bigger fans and bigger battery comes a larger device, which also costs more. And may also exclude Nintendo's main demographic - 7-14 year olds.5 Watts is pathetic for everyone that saw the graphic settings vs. power draw on Steamdeck or ROG Ally. Another reason this will be thrash to play Nintendo IPs only.
FFS, nowadays there is a power outlet everywhere - trains, planes, etc.
Compared to less than an hour you get with the PC handhelds at 15w. Even Steam deck gets you two at best and they have much bigger batteries.
And may also exclude Nintendo's main demographic - 7-14 year olds.
Steam Deck is currently the low power king. So not sure what you're on about.Thank fuck Nintendo went with nVidia. Switch 2 would be a fucking disaster on an AMD SoC.
Incorrect. Nintendo cares about keeping costs low and decent battery life.
Do you own a Steamdeck or ROG Ally? If not check YouTube videos - power draw of 25W will give you 90-120 minutes of game time on a Steamdeck, more on Ally X. So stop the BS. If Nintendo really wanted 5W operation it’s pathetic, no other way to put it.
I'd like to see how this info was collected. Because I'm sure I saw one before that used Nintendo's own online system as a source. Which is obviously not representative at all to the average user. Regardless, Nintendo will ALWAYS be a kid friendly company. You're delusional if you think they even look at Steam Deck or Rog Ally when creating Switch 2. Their priorities will be to keep it light, to keep it cool, to keep it small and to keep it cheap.
Just say you have no idea what you're talking about.
Switch is 2017 hardware situation, aka ancient times. Do not apply the same measure to what is happening now.Incorrect. Nintendo cares about keeping costs low and decent battery life.
Nintendo Switch is out now. So is steam deck and ROG Ally. Switch still outsells the other shit you are talking about by 1000 to 1 because of the above and also because of Nintendo software and branding. This will continue and so will Switch 2.
While you may care about only power and are okay with 90 minutes of battery life to squeeze extra resolution on your unoptimized PC games, Nintendo knows exactly what they are doing whether you agree with them or not. If they listened to you they would go broke my brother. You know this.
That....and I suspect much like Sony and Google, etc being in no rush to push their phone charging beyond 30watts, towards far more potentially dangerous levels of 150watt that phone reviewers only see as a positive on random brands, I would think Nintendo's attitude on too much power use, and too much battery capacity in a device being 50% targeted at young kids will also factor into things.Mmmmmh…. Not sure about that, Nintendo wanted the cheapest possible chip and to pack the smallest and cheapest battery they could.
4 hours battery life is nothing to shout about… but eh we will see.
With how like Portal Collection and Metroid Prime looked on Switch 1, what are we even talking about.
This, obviously. Also to keep it from being $450 or $500 at launch. Nintendo wants to hit $399 guaranteed.It's missing OLED so Nintendo can sell you an OLED version 2-3 years later
Ah! The ole switcheroo, Nintendo are clever making the same console twice with minimal effort and maximum profit.the switch 2 is sounding more just like a remaster of switch 1.
I've read somewhere it will only have DLSS 3 but i'm not sure about that. Would be nice if it has at least 3.5Switch 2 is supposed to have DLSS 3.6, right?
I think they're talking about the power consumption of the APU. The 9W figure is the total system power consumption at max screen brightness.So many reports that don't line up with each other, its getting hilarious.
5w? The original ran upwards of 9w in handheld, and if memory serves, around 16w when docked.
The end of this saga is going to be very interesting.
nope clirkbait i am known for my predicitionsDoes MLID actually know anything? I feel like that guy is a top tier bullshit YouTube bro.
I will buy it day 1.It's missing OLED so Nintendo can sell you an OLED version 2-3 years later
I'm the first to shit on AMD and champion Nvidia as vastly superior, but there ain't no way a 5 year old T239 design on a larger node is "performing the same" as a Z1 derivative outside of some ultra low power 5W mode the AMD chips aren't designed to run at. AMD's Radeon arm is incompetent, but they're not that incompetent.Bruh.
I'm the first to shit on AMD and champion Nvidia as vastly superior, but there ain't no way a 5 year old T239 design on a larger node is "performing the same" as a Z1 derivative outside of some ultra low power 5W mode the AMD chips aren't designed to run at. AMD's Radeon arm is incompetent, but they're not that incompetent.
To my understanding, MLID will usually get one legit scoop a year.Does MLID actually know anything? I feel like that guy is a top tier bullshit YouTube bro.
"The way you manufacture a Switch 2 is you take two Switches and duct tape."Sounds like switch 2 is not going to be that much more powerful then the switch like to switches slapped together.
It really is. My main TV is a Sony A95K, but I often prefer to play handheld simply because the screen is the perfect size and image quality is immaculate. It will be a step down to regular LCD unless Nintendo has some magic trick.no oled is a bummer, the screen on the switch oled is pristine
What is the original switches APU power draw? That would be an excellent basis to even discuss this, right? Just spitballing, but if the OG switch was the same 5w, on a larger process which was 20nm(if I recall correctly) wouldn't the same 5w be better put to use on an 8, or even 5nm process? Or, way more efficient in performance?I think they're talking about the power consumption of the APU. The 9W figure is the total system power consumption at max screen brightness.
For OG Switch that's about 8-9w in handheld mode. 11-12w docked.What is the original switches APU power draw? That would be an excellent basis to even discuss this, right? Just spitballing, but if the OG switch was the same 5w, on a larger process which was 20nm(if I recall correctly) wouldn't the same 5w be better put to use on an 8, or even 5nm process? Or, way more efficient in performance?
See, that's what I thought(although for more intensive games like TOTK it was reported that the switch in docked mode would peak at around 16w).For OG Switch that's about 8-9w in handheld mode. 11-12w docked.
Except it has something no one else does…1st Party Nintendo Games, which is the #1 reason to own a Switch in the first place.Switch 2 will be outdated out of the gate compared to handheld PCs, it will definitely show its age the moment MS/Sony step into this space.
Except it has something no one else does…1st Party Nintendo Games, which is the #1 reason to own a Switch in the first place.
This news is BS, AMD never was in the equation for the Switch 2, and we know that for years by official sources.See, that's what I thought(although for more intensive games like TOTK it was reported that the switch in docked mode would peak at around 16w).
So the question becomes;
Why would Nintendo limit the switch 2 at 5w in handheld mode, when it was much higher on the OG switch?
Unless of course this report is either BS, or half the story.