StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
Last of Us Part Two.
It isn't the selling of the game that is troublesome. It's the opportunity cost and diversion of resources to produce an almost completely unnecessary remake when there are an infinite number of other ideas that could be published.NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO BUY THE GAME
It's the opportunity cost and diversion of resources to produce an almost completely unnecessary remake when there are an infinite number of other ideas that could be published.
I did too. It was shorter.I personally like HZD more then HFW hope it has graphic close to hfw.
Do you know what resources were assigned? Cost involved compared to sales they'll make? Come on, these remasters take very little actual effort, they are done by small teams internally and cost peanuts compared to the cost of new games. I seriously doubt they took much resources away from development of new games (whether that's Horizon 3 or a new IP)It isn't the selling of the game that is troublesome. It's the opportunity cost and diversion of resources to produce an almost completely unnecessary remake when there are an infinite number of other ideas that could be published.
This is purely capitalist fodder for the stock market, not for us, and that is why we are upset.
1) We know why they are made. To make money. Same as every other product. People are not “braindead” they are frustrated.And if you took your blind hatred of Hulst off () you'd know why remasters are made, I'm a developer, I see it from the developer side of things as to why remasters are made.... it's money at the end of the day but there are other advantages as I have mentioned. No-one is forcing anyone to buy these remasters, and yet, they sell. But 'duurrrrr, braindead Sony Ponys', get the fuck out of here with that shit, if that was the case then Concord would have sold well.
Looking at Sony's moves this generation, they seem to have an allergy to giving things for free so I wouldn't count for it to happenAre PC players getting a free upgrade?
It isn't the selling of the game that is troublesome. It's the opportunity cost and diversion of resources to produce an almost completely unnecessary remake when there are an infinite number of other ideas that could be published.
This is purely capitalist fodder for the stock market, not for us, and that is why we are upset.
Looking at Sony's moves this generation, they seem to have an allergy to giving things for free so I wouldn't count for it to happen
If anyone buy this then you are a monkey. nothing else I can add to be honest. you deserve to be robbed
Anything that I don't want is an opportunity cost (from my POV), and those resources could have been better spent elsewhere to my liking.It isn't the selling of the game that is troublesome. It's the opportunity cost and diversion of resources to produce an almost completely unnecessary remake when there are an infinite number of other ideas that could be published.
This is purely capitalist fodder for the stock market, not for us, and that is why we are upset.
And that is why the original comment was fine: we don't have to buy it if we don't like it. We can ignore this product just like we ignore the hundreds of other games that release every year.
The main antagonist is a woman (Tilda van der Meer) and Regalla is also a woman. There are more good men in that world than there are women. I think you've got the wrong end of the stick.If this wasn't a game about an obnoxious, arrogant lesbian in a world where all the women are perfect and the men are bad, this might actually be good news.
It probably cost little to make. It's barely a waste. Like HZD running on the HFW engine for improvements.Fucking waste of money.
It'd be insane if they didn't, and yet I expect they won't.Are PC players getting a free upgrade?
It probably cost little to make. It's barely a waste. Like HZD running on the HFW engine for improvements.