Mister Wolf
Member
They are smarter than Square Enix.
No but I've platinumed Ghost of Tsushima and this looks like more of the same, GoT was my game of last genThose of you saying Ghost of Yotei, have we watched 1 hour of gameplay? Please send me link so I check it out. Last time I looked I only watched a cinematic trailer. Is that playable?
Stick to defending your garbage Marvel movies buddy cuz ure wrong.
That's not coming out in 2025. No way.Death Standing 2 looks better in every possible dimension.
We just gotta mod out those weapon strike particle effects. They went overboard.
Timed 3rd party exclusives basically carried this whole year for Sony outside of Astro Bot. It obviously makes a big difference to some people on here. They basically treat these kinds of deals as if they were Sony 1st party games. We just saw that cringe article from Push Square / IGN bragging about it.
Timed 3rd party exclusives basically carried this whole year for Sony outside of Astro Bot. It obviously makes a big difference to some people on here. They basically treat these kinds of deals as if they were Sony 1st party games. We just saw that cringe article from Push Square / IGN bragging about it.
And then we have WuKong, being an accidental timed console exclusive because the studio struggle with Series S.Of course it makes a difference. You just said it yourself in your first line. It's about exclusivity. Nobody cares if it's first or third party.
The game looks awesome and better than anything Sony has for 2025.
Nah, there are many AAA, AA and indie 3rd parties who self publish and accept money hats from the console makes.What does them wanting to self publish have to do with anything at all?
Common sense says they do it because it's a profitable investment for them. Pretty likely also helps them to continue growing their market share vs MS and Nintendo. And in specific case of Korean games, it may help Sony grow in Asia/South Korea.I don't know why they're still wasting money on deals like that. Xbox is dead.
Moving forward, these exclusivity deals with Japanese/Asian games won't be as much about limiting their availability on Xbox for some time as they will be about preventing a simultaneous release on the Switch 2 as well.Even as someone who currently plays mostly on Xbox Series X, I don’t understand that Sony even thinks about exclusivity deals: Xbox is more or less dead to the main public, there is not much to gain from that exclusivity I would imagine.
The bigger threat could be PC, but that additional market seems to be needed to get the revenue nowadays.
Maybe, in conjunction to the timed exclusivity arrangement, Sony seeked to publish the PS5 version themselves, as it was going to be the case with the Knights of the Old Republic remake.What does them wanting to self publish have to do with anything at all?
That's not coming out in 2025. No way.
They shouldn't spent money on time exclusives after Concord...
Why not make real exclusives with your own studios Sony?
Most Asian developers will turn that kind of deal down instantly.Moving forward, these exclusivity deals with Japanese/Asian games won't be as much about limiting their availability on Xbox for some time as they will be about preventing a simultaneous release on the Switch 2 as well.
It's a big open world single player game. The first we're getting from Korean devs on consoles basically ever. They clearly have aspirations of being the next Elden Ring. Sounds like they're confident in their game getting solid reviews and selling well. Open world games like this have broad appeal on all platforms.I'm not buying this.
Unless the money Sony offered in the deal was pitiful, I can't see how a fairly unknown studio whose first console non-MMO game, that is a new IP, wouldn't take an exclusivity deal from Sony. The benefits from Sony's marketing alone would more than make up for any marginal revenue they'd make on the Xbox platform.
The Xbox is basically a platform on life support. It's barely moving consoles at all. And the userbase has been conditioned by MS to wait till games come to GamePass, so buy signifncantly less games.
What does Xbox offer Pearl Abyss that is meaningful other than a shitty tard pack console (the XSS) that will hold back their technical vision for the game?
It would not surprise me to see this game selling something like 8x more on PC than on Xbox. Sony's deal would be essentially free money for Pearl Abyss. They let Sony take the risk marketing the game, get all the up front sales on PC and PS, and then they could just as easily make a later deal with MS to launch the game on Xbox GamePass, because they're more likely to get more in that kind of deal from MS, than relying on game sales on the Xbox platform.
you think they need sony to make money ? u must be jokingUhm for me a business point of view they should have taken the deal I have my doubts sales will reach any meaningful sales on Xbox
Depends on how much those deals are. If they are a couple of 100k, sure nobrainer. If they are in the millions and that's what i think it is for non indies, i don't think it's worth it if your only direkt competitor is dead. And you also always have the risc of a Forspoken. Too bad we never get numbers on those deals except the 100 million for Tomb Raider.Common sense says they do it because it's a profitable investment for them. Pretty likely also helps them to continue growing their market share vs MS and Nintendo. And in specific case of Korean games, it may help Sony grow in Asia/South Korea.
"I don't understand why Sony continues with timed exclusives. It makes sense to finance a game and make it a permanent exclusive, but if you're going to start doing timed exclusives, you might as well stop doing exclusives altogether."
Uhm for me a business point of view they should have taken the deal I have my doubts sales will reach any meaningful sales on Xbox
The game looks awesome and better than anything Sony has for 2025.
Silent Hill 2 carrying Sony in a year in which Helldivers 2 sold >5M units on PS5 alone (around 3 months after launch) is surely a take.Timed 3rd party exclusives basically carried this whole year for Sony outside of Astro Bot. It obviously makes a big difference to some people on here. They basically treat these kinds of deals as if they were Sony 1st party games. We just saw that cringe article from Push Square / IGN bragging about it.
Right, but that's kinda a whole different thing.Nah, there are many AAA, AA and indie 3rd parties who self publish and accept money hats from the console makes.
It just means that the studio considered that they'll make more money releasing in all platforms than accepting Sony's moneyhad. Meaning, they thought Sony didn't offer enough money.
Now this is something I hadn't considered, could be right!Maybe, in conjunction to the timed exclusivity arrangement, Sony seeked to publish the PS5 version themselves, as it was going to be the case with the Knights of the Old Republic remake.
Third-party relations money doesn't go into PlayStation Studios budget.Good. Fuck this moneyhat nonsense.
Invest that money into insomniac, ND, SSM and GG instead of laying off talented devs you numb nuts.
This quote literally makes NO SENSE!
hogwarts legacy sold PlaystationsExclusives are fine but if all you got is timed exclusives than stop doing them altogether makes no sense? Timed exclusives bring no value to the platform at all.
20 fucking characters at lvl 61 but "I never grind".I have 20 or so level 61 characters, i never grind. I dont even play that often. Its one of the best most realized open worlds, such great world building and environments
TrillionsIts their loss
Edit: explanation for the triggered folks! Refusing millions to gain a fraction of that through Xbox is not a smart business decision.
hogwarts legacy sold Playstations