• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Palworld Lawsuit patent details; as vague as "press A to jump". Nintendo has lost their minds

VGEsoterica

Member
Looked for a thread, didnt find one, but search function is kinda ass so if there is one...merge it? lol

Coming from a background in entertainment business law / patent law (design and physical object) the three patents Nintendo has referenced are so HILARIOUSLY vague it could literally affect a couple thousand games made that pre-date the patent filing. A real "prior art" situation where you have to wonder...what in the shit is Nintendo doing here? Are they just mad Palworld is eating their lunch and now that Sony is involved they see it as a direct attack? Obv they want that court injunction to stop distribution of Palworld...and MAYBE they'd get it in Japan, but any other developed nations court system would probably not even allow that case to see the inside of a court room.

Literally one patent talks in vague abstracts about tires in a racing game....what??

I think Nintendo has 100% lost the plot on this one...but it was fun to break it down since I've been following it since day 1

 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
DQ designers should sue Nintendo for ripping their designs for Pokemon then.

Friday Movie GIF
 

Saber

Gold Member
It can be merged, as we have details of the details of those patents that were both requested and done this year(extremelly recent). So this sounds more like a divide and conquer strategy than actually defend properties. I really hope they notice what is going on here before going to Nintendo side.
 
Last edited:

VGEsoterica

Member
Not surprised once I got a vague understanding of what they were suing for I figured this was a desperation move. I wonder if Nintendo was pressured into trying to do this from their other partners or something.
So hard to say what the motivation is but it feels like they just are upset someone beat them at their own genre. Palworld was what fans wanted. So as opposed to innovating and making Pokemon more polished and more feature rich…they sued Palworld
 

mdkirby

Gold Member
Isn’t a grenade a ball shaped item you throw on the ground that affects things infront of you?

Like I don’t understand how these patents were approved? Can a Japanese company just patent anything they want regardless of how long it’s existed? Could you patent a method for transiting oxygen from the environment into a biological interior, then just sue anyone you don’t like for breathing?
 

Saber

Gold Member
Isn’t a grenade a ball shaped item you throw on the ground that affects things infront of you?

Anything that you throw and affects the area around you coulb be included, and thats the reason this is incredibly dumb. A flashbang or a smoke grenade could be a part of this category. Or maybe a sphere of energy from Dragonball series like Genkidama, Sokidan or Makuhoidan.
 

ap_puff

Member
Not surprised once I got a vague understanding of what they were suing for I figured this was a desperation move. I wonder if Nintendo was pressured into trying to do this from their other partners or something.
Seems like corporate bullying
 

VGEsoterica

Member
Isn’t a grenade a ball shaped item you throw on the ground that affects things infront of you?

Like I don’t understand how these patents were approved? Can a Japanese company just patent anything they want regardless of how long it’s existed? Could you patent a method for transiting oxygen from the environment into a biological interior, then just sue anyone you don’t like for breathing?
With Nintendo's logic they should sue because Madden games have an object you throw that affects things. The game!
 
Nintendo reminds me of the 80 yr old granny who constantly keeps an eye out from the attic window for anyone that passes by her house and yells, "hey get off my lawn or I'm calling the cops!!" when they're not even on her lawn, just minding their own business strolling on the sidewalk.
 
Last edited:

HogIsland

Member
It doesn't matter to Nintendo if the patent is dumb as hell. The point is pocketpair will have to hire lawyers, be distracted by the bullshit process, bite their teeth about Japan vs US patent enforcement history yada yada. It's mob logic.
 
Last edited:

tkscz

Member
I don't know about Japan, but I can't see that flying in the US.

Nintendo's lawyers need to go sit down somewhere with this shit. This is pettiness to the nth degree and is not good for the industry.
 

Azelover

Titanic was called the Ship of Dreams, and it was. It really was.
This is gonna lead to a strange situation where nobody is allowed to do anything..

I don't like Palworld, or Pokemon. So in this particular juncture I don't particularly care. But good luck to the Palworld people. They're definitely the David in this situation.
 

mdkirby

Gold Member
Anything that you throw and affects the area around you coulb be included, and thats the reason this is incredibly dumb. A flashbang or a smoke grenade could be a part of this category. Or maybe a sphere of energy from Dragonball series like Genkidama, Sokidan or Makuhoidan.
How about a fishing line/lure
 
It’s 100% just a harassment lawsuit. Nintendo saying to everyone else “see what happens if you tread on our turf”
Yeah, 100 percent this. Nintendo is petrified that AAA studios will develop Pal World type games. They didn't realize that Pokémon knock off characters can sell just as well as the real IP does. I wouldn't be surprised if there are 3-4 Pal World type games currently in development
 
Last edited:
I hope they lose horribly bc this could spell a terrible precedent for other devs who want to be creative. This is worse than DEI or wokeness in games.
 

VGEsoterica

Member
The same if we're talking about that "ball" they use on fishing line to signal the fish being catch.
It could literally be used for antthing

Throwing a weapon in a FPS game? Yep

Baseball? Football? Basketball? Logic checks out

Rocket League? Well a ball is effecting the playfield so…why not!
 
Top Bottom