RurouniZel
Asks questions so Ezalc doesn't have to
Isn't December numbers = November x 2?
Usually? Yes.
But with the Wii U that might not amount to much. 100k November/200k December would be a disaster, as an example.
Isn't December numbers = November x 2?
Isn't December numbers = November x 2?
Not for the last couple of years, actually for a lot of the systems. PS3 was actually down M/M, despite the 5 week December, last year. I don't know if that's some sort of permanent shift in consumer behavior towards bigger Novembers and smaller Decembers or it's just that these systems are so old and the deals have been particularly good.Usually? Yes.
But with the Wii U that might not amount to much. 100k November/200k December would be a disaster, as an example.
The main selling point of Wii U is system sellers. I believe Mario 3D World is one of them. And of course Mario Kart.
Not for the last couple of years, actually for a lot of the systems. PS3 was actually down M/M, despite the 5 week December, last year. I don't know if that's some sort of permanent shift in consumer behavior towards bigger Novembers and smaller Decembers or it's just that these systems are so old and the deals have been particularly good.
Agreed, but I look forward to Nintendo doing something shockingly crazy yet again.Nintendo's future is a device that allows you to beam your 3DS/future portable games to your TV while you use the device itself as a controller. No one is interested in a dedicated home console from them anymore.
Their output would awesome too only focusing on one system.
Not for the last couple of years, actually for a lot of the systems. PS3 was actually down M/M, despite the 5 week December, last year. I don't know if that's some sort of permanent shift in consumer behavior towards bigger Novembers and smaller Decembers or it's just that these systems are so old and the deals have been particularly good.
This is not how it works. You can't just drop one or two games a quarter and expect it to sell well. It will just result in bumps just to fall later.What Wii U needs is a steady flow of games which it will not get hence it will really sell worse than GC and from that perspective be a business failure.If Nintendo can manage -- at a minimum -- Mario Kart, Smash, Animal Crossing, Zelda, and Pokken Fighters for 2014 (at least four of these are certain, anyway), coupled with a price drop and a new marketing/advertising overhaul, they will be in good stead to recover from this mess.
I can also see them making the GamePad an optional but highly incentivised extra (maybe bundling it with Nintendo Land and Wii Party U for $99), bringing the cost of the Wii U itself down to the $149-169 mark, or maybe $199 bundled with Mario Kart 8 or something.
The notion of selling a Nintendo "tablet" for under $100 (even if many parents will not initially realize that it requires a console as well) will surely create a sizeable buzz.
This is not how it works. You can't just drop one or two games a quarter and expect it to sell well. It will just result in bumps on to fall later.What Wii U needs is a steady flow of games which it will not get hence it will really sell worse than GC and from that perspective be a business failure.
Well that's why I didn't say new games only...This is not how it works. You can't just drop one or two games a quarter and expect it to sell well. It will just result in bumps on to fall later.What Wii U needs is a steady flow of games which it will not get hence it will really sell worse than GC and from that perspective be a business failure.
Japans possible total and bizarre indifference to 3D World so far is concerning and hopefully some incredibly localised phenomenon at Comgnet or worse Japan.
If its not and the WiiU has contracted some incurable "invisible console" disease where even a new big 3D Mario does nothing to stimulate the market, I'm not sure what people will expect Mario Kart and Smash to do. Will Nintendo just be breaking even or worse on software like 3D World and a Zelda? Not to mention all the other potential bombas along the way (Bayonetta 2, Yarn Yoshi, X).
Those results would put a nail on the head of their console business even if it does bizarrely conform to the MINUS 10 MILLION CUSTOMERS trend they have going. I still think it can maybe eek it out to 15, depending on how long they leave it to flail around on the market and when that big savage price cut comes down.
Games sell system. I think the general consensus for those of us who are legitimately being optimistic for Wii U are hoping that Mario 3D World jump starts the system, not single handlely sustains it. A higher multi million userbase bodes well for Wii U's future.This is not how it works. You can't just drop one or two games a quarter and expect it to sell well. It will just result in bumps just to fall later.What Wii U needs is a steady flow of games which it will not get hence it will really sell worse than GC and from that perspective be a business failure.
As much as some people are rooting for it, not at all.Doesn't this show that Nintendos time as a console maker is over?
Doesn't this show that Nintendos time as a console maker is over? Not even their golden gooses are selling well on it. But man is vita selling bad
when was the mario and luigi bundle released? october or november?
Well, that sucks. Hoped for 170k at least. Not a huge bomba considering the budget, but not great either. Please Sony, for the love of god time your releases better next generation....120k< The REAL Ellen Page < 125k
Sure, if you don't consider the 3DS a console.
As much as some people are rooting for it, not at all.
Games sell system. I think the general consensus for those of us who are legitimately being optimistic for Wii U are hoping that Mario 3D World jump starts the system, not single handlely sustains it. A higher multi million userbase bodes well for Wii U's future.
Sure, if you don't consider the 3DS a console.
Third parties don't care about Nintendo or Nintendo doesn't realize how important they are.
.
Beyond was awesome WTF is wrong with people.
Just catching up on this thread. It's painfully obvious that Nintendo's terrible design decisions for the Wii U are coming home to roost. Nintendo designed a console that would:
1) have a very low power draw;
2) fit in a tiny case; and
3) have a unique hook for a Nintendo first-party title (the Gamepad / Nintendoland).
The first two have had a negative market impact, by guaranteeing that the Wii U wouldn't have the visual oopmh to scream "Next-gen here!" And the third continued Nintendo's trend of ignoring third-parties. Nintendo essentially got lucky when they did that last gen - when you have a sales monster like Wii Sports, you can get away with a lot. They don't have a Wii Sports this gen.
I've also been saying for a while that I think Nintendo doesn't understand why the Wii was successful - compelling, accessible software at a friendly price point, with a great marketing campaign. Instead, they seem to think people just loved Mii's. So they make a bunch more Mii software (which has fallen flat), they raise the price point, and they make a Homer of a controller. And of course, they essentially stopped mass-advertising.
What did they expect would happen?
As for stripping out the Gamepad, that could stop the hemorraging, but Nintendo needs to stop putting time and money into this horrible failure of a console and start working on the next home console. The "but look what happened to Sega!" argument is unavailing. Circumstances are completely different. I'd say, look what happened to Microsoft - they went from the short-gen Xbox to the long-gen 360, which did pretty darn well. Get out the rest of the Wii U titles already in development, and figure out how to launch "The Nintendo" summer 2015. Whether a standalone console, or part of a console/handheld hybrid solution, it can't do worse.
Edit: One more quick point. I don't see how dropping the Wii was anything but a mistake for the latest Lego game. It's the number one platform for similar releases. Are those people who used to buy Lego on Wii going to buy another platform to play it on, or just not buy the latest Lego? I'd guess the latter. EA knows what's up with that kind of thing - that's why they released(are still releasing?) Madden on the PS2 for so long.
If the holiday sales are atrocious (as I'm sadly staring to believe will be the case) Nintendo May have to:
1. Drop the Gamepad to an accessory
2. Rebrand as Wii 2 (but still the same machine.
3. Drop price to $200
4. Wii Sports Club pre-installed
Thats not true.
They dont want to be held hostage by the big publishers.
Games sell system. I think the general consensus for those of us who are legitimately being optimistic for Wii U are hoping that Mario 3D World jump starts the system, not single handlely sustains it. A higher multi million userbase bodes well for Wii U's future.
Beyond was awesome WTF is wrong with people.
Isn't December numbers = November x 2?
I'd argue Warner is already gone.Warner won't be far behind.
B) Any third party on a Nintendo platform should just leave. Depart post-haste.
So for instance, tell us how it would work in games like Zombi U, Nintendo Land, Wii Party U, WiiFit U, Game & Wario, among others.Even some games that require the GamePad could theoretically get patches to change the game's UI to not require it anymore.
What.? The game was expensive, no doubt about itWell, that sucks. Hoped for 170k at least. Not a huge bomba considering the budget, but not great either. Please Sony, for the love of god time your releases better next generation....
X over Y...
I'd argue Warner is already gone.
Middle-Earth: Shadows of Mordor - PC, PS3, 360, PS4, XB1
Dying Light - PC, PS3, 360, PS4, XB1
Mad Max - PC, PS3, 360, PS4, XB1
Injustice: Ultimate Edition - PC, PS3, 360, PS4, PSV
The only unreleased game they have slated for it is Lego The Movie The Videogame.
Also, general query, looking this up I noticed that Scribblenauts DC game released in September? Did we get any numbers for that?