www.engadget.com
So,if they make thier plant in China carbon neutral or even carbon positive it won’t matter? Because it’s it’s China?
Isn’t that basically what every countries Carbon Tax equates to? Buying the carbon from countries that produce less of it?
This is such a dumb argument that a company can't do anything to reduce pollution if they're not literally going for absolute zero carbon emissions on every single aspect of their production/distribution line. This is like seeing a guy give money to a homeless charity and then chastising him for being a hypocrite because he isn't giving up all of his worldly possessions, climbing into the gutter himself and dying destitute.
Are they MS coal fired stations?
Care to prove that? Or it is their word against yours?
Considering that the effects of increasing carbon emissions is a scientific fact at this point, please stop pretending that all of your anti climate change rhetoric and aversion of companies and nations doing anything to actually reduce CO2 is anything more than a faith based political conspiracy theory you hold because political pundits and reactionaries told you so. Get your politics out of science. I'd also like to see your evidence on who "zee elites" are.
So you're not only anti science but full on anti capitalist? Damn. I wonder what other political groups throughout history have also accused "zee elites" of running the world whilst also thinking that free market capitalism damages nations because of those "((globalist elites))" in charge...
Much like NASA fakes to flat Earthers, it's "just obvious".
I think you don’t understand how carbon laws or or you disagree with them. In the end it doesn’t matter as it is an internationally accepted way of looking at it.
Says Mister "Globalist Agenda"
Nope. But I recognise that a company can make efforts in one aspect whilst still having to deal with other more negative ones to remain competitive because that's what the market dictates. You literally came into this thread complaining that MS shouldn't do anything to reduce carbon emissions if they're still going to ship consoles by air. Your position is that MS should just not give a fuck about carbon emissions in any aspect or not sell worldwide (and pretty much go out of business).
And I will reiterate that carbon polices in most modern countries give them the right to roll carbon into countries that aren’t producing it.
Yes and no. There are plenty of things we can do, like stop getting a new phone every goddam year, getting eco friendly food instead of going to fast food chains, walking or riding a bike to work instead of driving a SUV. The list is long. However, you’re right in the sense that even if we do all this, the richest 10% can ruin it by not giving up their lifestyle.
You really can't expect individuals to change anything. They'll always take planes, buy fast food, drive massive cars... That's why the companies who make this stuff need to do what they can to reduce CO2 emissions and gouvernements have to regulate. Make planes at use less CO2, use more eco-friendly materials in your fast food containers, give incentives to get people to buy cars that pollute less and promote said cars. ...And make consoles with smaller CO2 footprints.
fee.org
You are so full of shit, man. Make planes that use less CO2? Yeah, as if that’s gonna help.
www.sustainability-times.com
Carbon increased the vegattion of the planet. Man made Glomar Warming is myth, the climate is always changing, mostly because of the distance from eath to the sun. More virtue signaling. This means the next Xbox will be weak and the games will be boring and awful.
5 Surprising Scientific Facts about Earth’s Climate
Here are some facts—scientifically recognized and published in peer-reviewed journals—that may raise your eyebrows.
We're already fucked in many ways but it's still worth curbing what we can. Things are bad and are going to get worst but they could be even more worse if we all just give up. Although you're right that this stuff should have started about 30 years ago. The world is going to see some serious change within the next 30 years and the climate change deniers are going to be scratching their heads wondering what the fuck happened (no doubt they'll just blame the immigrants, though).You are so full of shit, man. Make planes that use less CO2? Yeah, as if that’s gonna help.
Yes, sure, it’s positive in a way, but they’re talking out of their asses, and so are Sony, and so are you, and so am I, because I know I won’t be able to live the way I should in order to slow climate change, but I know my facts, and the fact is that it’s already too late, unless capitalism comes to a halt right the fuck NOW.
Deny it all you want, but that’s a fact.
UN: it's too late to save the Arctic from warming
Winter temperatures in the Arctic could rise by 3°C by 2050 and between 5°C and 9°C by 2100.
They have fleets of these.
