SodiumBenzoate
Member
Great let's permanently fuck up the dopamine reward system in kids too, can't see anything going wrong with this
If you're talking about the UCSF study from 4 years ago, it suggests a combination of cannabinoids and opiates, not replacing one with the other. To my knowledge that's the last credible study on such matters.This simply is not true, it's even been medically proven edible cannabis is actually better for both chronic/long term pain management than opiates
Also - You think synthetic opiates are an astonishing medical breakthrough?
Great let's permanently fuck up the dopamine reward system in kids too, can't see anything going wrong with this
The kids this would be prescribed for are in terrible shape to begin with.
jesus Christ. I hope no one posting these things has a child that is in need of these medications and treatments. Perhaps some folks should be volunteering in the children's hospitals for some perspective.
Dr. Hertz added that OxyContins new pediatric approval is similar to its approved use in adults: to manage pain severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment for which alternative treatment options are inadequate. But she said unlike the adult indication, the pediatric indication stipulates that before a child can be prescribed OxyContin, he or she must already be taking and tolerating at least 20 mg of oxycodone a day.
When used in conjunction with opiates, cannabinoids lead to a greater cumulative relief of pain, resulting in a reduction in the use of opiates (and associated side-effects) by patients in a clinical setting. Additionally, cannabinoids can prevent the development of tolerance to and withdrawal from opiates, and can even rekindle opiate analgesia after a prior dosage has become ineffective.
The discovery of cannabinoid receptors and their putative endogenous ligands raises questions as to the nature of the effects produced by cannabinoids on neural circuits that mediate pain and whether endogenous cannabinoids produced by the brain or in the periphery serve naturally to modulate pain. A sizable body of previous work showed that cannabinoid agonists suppress pain behavior in a variety of models of acute and chronic pain.
Cannabinoids and opioids share several pharmacologic properties and may act synergistically. The potential pharmacokinetics and the safety of the combination in humans are unknown. We therefore undertook a study to answer these questions.
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that endocannabinoids serve naturally to suppress pain. While it is now clear that cannabinoids suppress nociceptive neurotransmission, more work is needed to establish the clinical utility of these compounds. The few human studies conducted to date produced mixed results, with more promising findings coming from studies of clinical pain as compared with experimental pain. The therapeutic potential of cannabinoids remains an important topic for future investigations.
You replied literally 9 minutes after I posted those links - wow you must be some super genius to read every single study, understand them and then post your replies.
I don't think I am gonna try harder, you win super genius forum post master
There are summaries for each. We read them but clearly you didn't.
All these studies are some variant of this one.You replied literally 9 minutes after I posted those links - wow you must be some super genius to read every single study, understand them and then post your replies.
I don't think I am gonna try harder, you win super genius forum post master
You replied literally 9 minutes after I posted those links - wow you must be some super genius to read every single study, understand them and then post your replies.
I don't think I am gonna try harder, you win super genius forum post master
Well then you and that other poster can both bask in your online pseudo genius together because even just reading the summaries and posting a thought out reply in less than 10 minutes is impressive
Guess this is why you both average 25 posts a day while the rest of us plebs are not worthy and regulated to discussions and time spent in real life
Well then you and that other poster can both bask in your online pseudo genius together because even just reading the summaries and posting a thought out reply in less than 10 minutes is impressive
Guess this is why you both average 25 posts a day while the rest of us plebs are not worthy and regulated to discussions and time spent in real life
Did either of you even read the article?
Seems like a weird reaction.
"Hey this thing is available that wasn't available we think it'll help sick kids"
"Yeah but think of the kids that...still won't get it! Because what if their parents steal it! Awful."
There's no real downside here
She added: Parents and caregivers should follow all the usual safeguards for storing powerful medications when OxyContin is in their home. Briefly, make sure the medications are stored securely so young children never have direct access and also so that no one else in the household such as older children, siblings, friends, or other visitors have direct access.
You replied literally 9 minutes after I posted those links - wow you must be some super genius to read every single study, understand them and then post your replies.
I don't think I am gonna try harder, you win super genius forum post master
Well then you and that other poster can both bask in your online pseudo genius together because even just reading the summaries and posting a thought out reply in less than 10 minutes is impressive
Guess this is why you both average 25 posts a day while the rest of us plebs are not worthy and regulated to discussions and time spent in real life
All you kids with bone cancer should just suck it up.
There are people in this thread who don't understand what the world was like before modern pain medications and the idea that you would keep relief from a child in agony is idiotic.
How do you and everyone else in this thread not see the huge money grab going on here?
Oxycontin is a brand, so are all its variants, so is Suboxone which you use to get off of it - it all makes tons of money for a few specific companies.
This has nothing to do with what's good for these kids (they can still receive any other low dose opiate or generic one), its just about increasing their "product line" to one more "model" and the majority of you are defending this disgusting legal pedaling and branding of drugs
Coming from the guy hailing medical marijuana as the next coming this is pretty hilarious.This has nothing to do with what's good for these kids (they can still receive any other low dose opiate or generic one), its just about increasing their "product line" to one more "model" and the majority of you are defending this disgusting legal pedaling and branding of drugs
How do you and everyone else in this thread not see the huge money grab going on here?
Oxycontin is a brand, so are all its variants, so is Suboxone which you use to get off of it - it all makes tons of money for a few specific companies.
This has nothing to do with what's good for these kids (they can still receive any other low dose opiate or generic one), its just about increasing their "product line" to one more "model" and the majority of you are defending this disgusting legal pedaling and branding of drugs
How do you and everyone else in this thread not see the huge money grab going on here?
Oxycontin is a brand, so are all its variants, so is Suboxone which you use to get off of it - it all makes tons of money for a few specific companies.
This has nothing to do with what's good for these kids (they can still receive any other low dose opiate or generic one), its just about increasing their "product line" to one more "model" and the majority of you are defending this disgusting legal pedaling and branding of drugs
How do you and everyone else in this thread not see the huge money grab going on here?
Oxycontin is a brand, so are all its variants, so is Suboxone which you use to get off of it - it all makes tons of money for a few specific companies.
This has nothing to do with what's good for these kids (they can still receive any other low dose opiate or generic one), its just about increasing their "product line" to one more "model" and the majority of you are defending this disgusting legal pedaling and branding of drugs
Lol god damnOh man, I hope cannabis is effective for burn wounds.
How do you and everyone else in this thread not see the huge money grab going on here?
Oxycontin is a brand, so are all its variants, so is Suboxone which you use to get off of it - it all makes tons of money for a few specific companies.
This has nothing to do with what's good for these kids (they can still receive any other low dose opiate or generic one), its just about increasing their "product line" to one more "model" and the majority of you are defending this disgusting legal pedaling and branding of drugs
That's pretty fucked up and disturbing.
What the fuck how is something like this even a consideration. Please don't do this, do hurt this kids lives by letting them get ahold of this substance, this just sounds so bad.
As long as it's not pot. That would be outrageous.
Yeah, but pot is cheap meaning the poors can get it and use it without drug companies making a shit ton of profit. In other words, no incentive for these companies. But synthetic heroin, they need them for that shit. And it's really, really expensive.
This has nothing to do with what's good for these kids (they can still receive any other low dose opiate or generic one), its just about increasing their "product line" to one more "model" and the majority of you are defending this disgusting legal pedaling and branding of drugs