At this point they are stuck on stupid lol
We had this part figured out before launch.
Pretty sure he leaked the 10 tflops PS5 figure to DukeBlueBalls and Colbert the morning the Road to PS5 went live. Richard had been given an early look at it straight by Cerny himself and had his article go up at 12PM, the same time as the road to ps5 went live. However, colbert and DBB were posting about it at around 10AM on era.
Uh... the reason has already been stated. Those PS dev kits have the better GPU compiler and optimizations which can be made due to supporting one specific SKU and not 2 (in the case of Xbox consoles) and PC..... I mean, the games you're talking about all use Unreal Engine.. lmao.
Come to what exactly?
I've been involved in 360 -> PC ports enough to say that DX alone did not preclude the need for a 'nixes'. There was always work - and often substantial amount if you wanted to keep Alexes of the PCMR not raging about the ports.
Is there any upside to DirectX on a console?
Because it's been the narrative that they decided to parrott from MS since the consoles launch and changing it now would mean admitting that either : a) they lied through rheir teeth. b) they understand far less of consoles engineering that they like to pretend or c) some sort of combination of the two preceding points
Sure, but they are beholden to the realities of development just like any other developers. Optimization doesn't just come down to whether or not something is possible technically, it comes down to costs and time and whether it's reasonable. When MS was developing Sea of Thieves for example... they split development between console and PC. They had a finite time and budget for development and optimization. Probably never ever figured that the game would eventually come to any other platforms at that time and would be so scrutinized. Then you have to remember that MS own tools and development kits back then wouldn't be as great as they are today... so those games were potentially made on an older version of the engine with less optimizations. Whereas the PS5 version was likely ported by a smaller team with the only pressures being to port it as well as possible... and so you add that to the fact that Unreal Engine is already highly optimized for Playstation, and PS' better development tools.. and you have the outcome.
Cause they get paid for doing this.
We had this part figured out before launch.
I posted this graph many times after the xbox hot chips conference where they themselves revealed the xsx numbers. We extrapolated the numbers for the PS5 and immediately realized the ps5 would have its own advantages.
Without sense?? What games do you mean by first party? GW Tokyo?? Sea Of thieves?? Hi-fi?? I think you should look at the specific situations in those games before talking about something and accusing people of talking nonsense. Although it is not that miracles can be expected from you and the usual suspects responding with an emoji in the absence of arguments.
Even those often favour PS5
MS fucked themselves when they went Day One with PC and didnt hire a pc porting studio like Nixxes. Their studios were already stretched thin then were forced to make PC ports then 2 more xbox series ports during the cross gen period.
www.eurogamer.net
Did we because I remember being attacked for trying to explain it
If Microsoft don't use just the TFLOPS to compare Xbox Series X GPU to the Xbox One & Xbox One X why is everyone else using it to compare it to PS5 ?
They only claim a 4-6X raw GPU advantage over Xbox One while having 9X TFLOPS advantage , The triangles rate advantage is the part that bring it down to 4 -6X the raw GPU output & PS5 actually has the advantage in triangle & pixel fill rate so why do people keep using the Xbox Series X GPU...www.neogaf.com
DF is so biased, their whole premise begins on the wrong foot, 20% theoretical compute advantage can hardly be "considerably more powerful" especially when taking into account PS5s GPU own advantages of higher clocks and more cache per CU
For arguments sake even if hypothetically SX were to consistently beat PS5 in most games and its 18 to 20% theoretical compute advantage could scale linearly it still would not be enough to provide considerably better results. 20% is a small difference
Yep, on new install of VS Pro/Enterprise I probably spend hours confiding things just right. Also could never manage moving my environment cleanly between PCs yet.They have also spent a hell of a lot of time integrating new technology into Visual Studio over the years. The number of templates has increased dramatically. This "one size fits all" approach doesn't just incorporate console and PC gaming, but Azure, Windows, web, mobile.....etc. It is a Swiss army knife that is made up of more Swiss army knives. Here's a screenshot....
Then compare PlayStation's compiler and APIs.......it's 100% dedicated to PlayStation.
Seeing that face reminds me a bit of Jack Nicholson in the shining lol……..well they do say the most brilliant minds are evil.
A 20% compute advantage is absolutely considerably more powerful within products belonging to the same generation. The problem is that you need games that push compute to realize it. In games which do push compute, we do indeed see Xbox pulling ahead of Playstation.
They have names you know.
Ahh yes, optimizing for a lot less memory with "a few lines of code" . Tell that to Larian.
